6533b7d2fe1ef96bd125f3d3

RESEARCH PRODUCT

CT-Angiographie bei arterieller Verschlußkrankheit: Vergleich von 3 Rekonstruktionsverfahren

O. RiekerAchim NeufangManfred ThelenPeter MildenbergerFranz SchwedenH. V. Zitzewitz

subject

medicine.medical_specialtymedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryVascular diseaseVolume renderingIterative reconstructionmedicine.diseaseRendering (computer graphics)Maximum intensity projectionArterial Occlusive DiseasesAngiographyMedicineRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingRadiologyTomographybusiness

description

Purpose To evaluate different rendering techniques of CT data for the assessment of long vessel segments in peripheral vascular occlusive disease. Material and methods 40 CT angiograms (aortoiliac: n = 20, leg arteries: n = 20) were viewed using three different rendering techniques: 1, maximum intensity projection (MIP); 2, volume rendering (VR); 3, shaded surface display (SSD). CT angiograms were obtained in 6 or 8 projections. Axial cross-section images were analysed using an interactive cine mode. Intraarterial DSA was the standard in all cases. Results The sensitivities for the diagnosis of occlusive disease were 100% (cross-section images), 94% (MIP), 91% (VR) and 93% (SSD). The specificities were 100%, 99%, 99% and 99%, respectively. For the accurate grading of high-grade (> 75%) stenoses, the sensitivities were 85% (cross-section images), 62% (MIP), 44% (VR) and 35% (SSD). Specificity was 99% for all techniques. Conclusions CTA is accurate in occlusive disease. Interactive viewing of cross-section images is the most accurate technique. MIP is superior to VR in the imaging of high-grade stenoses because contrast-to-noise ratio is high and thresholding is not necessary.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1015545