6533b7d2fe1ef96bd125f6c8

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch

Agustín Pascual-moscardóPriscilla Medina-sotomayorIsabel Camps A

subject

OrthodonticsScannerDental Impression TechniqueComputer scienceDental Models030206 dentistryModels Dentalstomatognathic diseases03 medical and health sciencesDental archDental ArchImaging Three-Dimensional0302 clinical medicinemedicine.anatomical_structurestomatognathic systemmedicineComputer-Aided DesignDental Impression TechniqueTooth PreparationsOral SurgeryToothSoftware

description

Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital scanners is acceptable for scanning a complete dental arch. However, whether that accuracy is sufficient for only 1 tooth within the dental scan of a complete dental arch is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of 4 intraoral scanners on a complete dental arch and on prepared teeth digitally isolated from the digital scan in terms of trueness and precision. Material and methods A model of a complete dental arch with tooth preparations was scanned 40 times with each of the 4 digital scanners. Their accuracy was evaluated by using 3-dimensional (3D) software to compare the test models with a highly accurate reference model. The data were digitally processed to isolate the prepared teeth and evaluate them in the same way. The data were statistically analyzed using the Levene test and the Tamhane's T2 test (α=.05). Results In scans of a complete dental arch, the True Definition scanner had the best accuracy values, followed by TRIOS, iTero, and Omnicam. For prepared teeth isolated from the dental arch, both True Definition and TRIOS had the best values, followed by iTero and Omnicam. Conclusions In both long-span scans of the complete dental arch and isolated prepared teeth, the True Definition scanner had the greatest accuracy, closely followed by TRIOS.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.020