6533b7d3fe1ef96bd1261542
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Egg donation, surrogate mothering, and cloning: attitudes of men and women in Germany based on a representative survey
Elmar BrählerYve Stöbel-richterKerstin WeidnerSusanne GoldschmidtManfred E. Beutelsubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyAdolescentReproductive Techniques AssistedCloning OrganismPopulationReproductive medicineMEDLINEPsychological interventionPreimplantation genetic diagnosisInterviews as TopicYoung AdultEgg donationGermanymedicineHumanseducationSurrogate MothersGynecologyFamily CharacteristicsSex Characteristicseducation.field_of_studyMarital StatusOocyte Donationbusiness.industryObstetrics and GynecologyMiddle AgedHealth SurveysReligionReproductive MedicineFamily medicineEducational StatusMarital statusFemalebusinessAttitude to HealthSex characteristicsdescription
Objective To determine opinions and attitudes of the German general population toward the treatment methods of reproductive medicine: egg donation, surrogate mothering, and reproductive cloning. Design Representative survey. Setting German general population: face-to-face interviews at home with 2,110 persons, aged 18–50 years. Patient(s) Patients were not included. Intervention(s) No interventions took place. Main Outcome Measure(s) Approval and disapproval of treatment methods of reproductive medicine and preimplantation genetic diagnosis were assessed by questionnaires regarding medical, age, reasons, or general. Result(s) Overall, the diverse treatment methods of reproductive medicine found comparable rates of approval and disapproval. Legalization of egg donation was approved by a slight majority (50.8%), particularly for medical reasons (35.9%). Surrogate mothering found lower overall rates of approval (43.7%), 28.5% supported an admission for medical reasons. Reproductive cloning was rejected by the vast majority (82.9%). Attitudes to reproductive medicine were affected by age and the individual reproductive experiences. Conclusion(s) New techniques in reproductive medicine and their development provide hope and health promises for affected couples but also entail long-term risks and ethical issues. Balancing the individual's right to a reproductive autonomy and choice and ethical standards will constitute a future challenge for society. Results demonstrate considerable uncertainty and information deficits in the community.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009-07-01 | Fertility and Sterility |