6533b7d4fe1ef96bd1261ee2

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Vaccination with ENO1 DNA Prolongs Survival of Genetically Engineered Mice with Pancreatic Cancer

Moitza PrincipeGiovanni PercontiPaola CappelloSimona RollaFederica CavalloFederica CavalloMirella GiovarelliRoberto ChiarleSalvatore FeoFrancesco Novelli

subject

medicine.medical_treatmentDNA Vaccine; Enolase; Parnceratic cancer; Transgeneic miceEnolasegenetically engineered miceceEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayTransgeneic miceDNA vaccination03 medical and health sciencesMice0302 clinical medicineImmune systemPancreatic cancerGenetic modelmedicineVaccines DNADNA VaccineAnimalsSurvival rate030304 developmental biology0303 health sciencesImmunity CellularHepatologybiologyENO.1; DNA Vaccine; genetically engineered miceceVaccinationGastroenterologyParnceratic cancerImmunotherapyNeoplasms Experimentalmedicine.diseaseImmunohistochemistryMice Mutant Strains3. Good healthPancreatic NeoplasmsSurvival RateSettore BIO/18 - GeneticaTumor progression030220 oncology & carcinogenesisPhosphopyruvate HydrataseImmunologybiology.proteinAntibodyENO.1Carcinoma Pancreatic Ductal

description

Background & Aims Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is an aggressive tumor, and patients typically present with late-stage disease; rates of 5-year survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy are low. Antibodies against α-enolase (ENO1), a glycolytic enzyme, are detected in more than 60% of patients with PDA, and ENO1-specific T cells inhibit the growth of human pancreatic xenograft tumors in mice. We investigated whether an ENO1 DNA vaccine elicits antitumor immune responses and prolongs survival of mice that spontaneously develop autochthonous, lethal pancreatic carcinomas. Methods We injected and electroporated a plasmid encoding ENO1 (or a control plasmid) into Kras G12D /Cre (KC) mice and Kras G12D /Trp53 R172H /Cre (KPC) mice at 4 weeks of age (when pancreatic intraepithelial lesions are histologically evident). Antitumor humoral and cellular responses were analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, flow cytometry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot and cytotoxicity assays. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results The ENO1 vaccine induced antibody and a cellular response and increased survival times by a median of 138 days in KC mice and 42 days in KPC mice compared with mice given the control vector. On histologic analysis, the vaccine appeared to slow tumor progression. The vaccinated mice had increased serum levels of anti-ENO1 immunoglobulin G, which bound the surface of carcinoma cells and induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity. ENO1 vaccination reduced numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and T-regulatory cells and increased T-helper 1 and 17 responses. Conclusions In a genetic model of pancreatic carcinoma, vaccination with ENO1 DNA elicits humoral and cellular immune responses against tumors, delays tumor progression, and significantly extends survival. This vaccination strategy might be developed as a neoadjuvant therapy for patients with PDA.

10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.020http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016508513000772