6533b7d4fe1ef96bd126205d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Sealing effectiveness of fissure sealant bonded with universal adhesive systems on saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel.
Mahtab MemarpourMehran ZareanFaranak RazmjoeiFereshteh Shafieisubject
MolarSalivaMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeDentistry02 engineering and technology03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicinestomatognathic systemGeneral DentistryPhosphoric acidEnamel paintbusiness.industrySealantResearchfungitechnology industry and agriculture030206 dentistryContamination021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]Community and Preventive Dentistrychemistryvisual_artUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASvisual_art.visual_art_mediumAdhesive0210 nano-technologybusinessdescription
Background The effectiveness of sealants is dependent upon their adhesion to enamel surface. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sealing ability of a pit and fissure sealant used with a universal adhesive (etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch modes) when the site is contaminated with saliva. Adhesive properties were evaluated as microleakage and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) characteristics. Material and methods A total of 72 mandibular third molars were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=12). Occlusal pits and fissures were sealed with an unfilled resin fissure sealant (FS) material with or without saliva contamination. The groups included: 1) phosphoric acid etching + FS (control), 2) phosphoric acid etching + Scotchbond Universal (etch-and-rinse) + FS, 3) phosphoric acid etching + saliva + Scotchbond Universal (etch-and-rinse) + FS, 4) Scotchbond Universal (self-etching) + FS,5) Scotchbond Universal (self-etching) + saliva + FS, and 6) Scotchbond Universal (self-etching) + saliva + Scotchbond Universal + FS. After thermocycling, the teeth were placed in 0.5% fuchsin, sectioned, and evaluated by digital microscopy. Two samples from each group were also observed by SEM. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests for a significance of p Results There were significant differences among groups. Groups 1,2 and 4 showed the least microleakage, with no significant differences among groups. Saliva contamination led to increased microleakage and gap formation in SEM images in groups 3, 5 and 6. Conclusions The fissure sealing ability of the universal adhesive in etch-and-rinse or self-etch modes was similar to that of conventional acid etching. Saliva contamination had a negative effect on sealant adhesion to pretreated enamel. Key words:Pit and fissure sealant, Universal adhesive, Saliva.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017-10-27 | Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry |