6533b7d4fe1ef96bd12631ec

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence

Angela ParentiDavide FiaschiAndrea Mario Lavezzi

subject

0211 other engineering and technologiesstructural and cohesion fund02 engineering and technologyEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)DevelopmentEu countriesspatial panel modelAnnual growth %European regional policyEuropean regional disparitieEuropean regional disparities0502 economics and businessEconomicsDevelopment3304 Education050207 economicsPublic economics05 social sciences021107 urban & regional planningGrowth modelspatial spilloversstructural and cohesion fundsspatial spilloverBasis pointDemographic economicsEuropean regional disparities; European regional policy; spatial panel model; spatial spillovers; structural and cohesion fundsExternality

description

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy in the regions of 12 EU countries in the period 1991–2008, on the basis of a spatial growth model, which allows for the identification of both direct and indirect effects of EU funds on GDP per worker growth. We find that “Objective 1” funds are characterized by strong spatial externalities and a positive and concave effect on the growth of GDP per worker, which reaches a peak at the ratio funds/GDP of approximately 3 percent and becomes non-significant after 4 percent. “Objective 2” and “Cohesion” funds have nonsignificant effects, while all the other funds exert a positive and significant effect, but their size is very limited. EU Cohesion Policy, moreover, appears to have increased its effectiveness over time. In the period 2000–2006 Objective 1 funds are estimated to have a median multiplier equal to 1.52, and to have added 0.37 percent to the GDP per worker growth. Overall, in the period 1991–2008, funds are estimated to have added 1.4 percent to the median annual growth, and to have reduced regional disparities of 8 basis points in terms of the Gini index.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12364