6533b7d4fe1ef96bd126343f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Impact of Aortic Stenosis on Myofiber Stress: Translational Application of Left Ventricle-Aortic Coupling Simulation
Arthur C. HillSalvatore PastaJiang YaoJulius M. GuccioneKevin L. SackAndrew D. WisneskiTobias DeuseYunjie Wangsubject
medicine.medical_specialtyPhysiology0206 medical engineeringfinite element methodHemodynamics02 engineering and technology030204 cardiovascular system & hematologylcsh:PhysiologyStress (mechanics)03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicine.arteryInternal medicinePhysiology (medical)medicinemyofiber stressMyocyteAortalcsh:QP1-981business.industryAortic stenosisBiomechanicsrealistic simulationSettore ING-IND/34 - Bioingegneria Industrialemedicine.disease020601 biomedical engineeringStenosismedicine.anatomical_structureVentricleCirculatory systemCardiologyventricular functionventricle-aortic couplingbusinessdescription
The severity of aortic stenosis (AS) has traditionally been graded by measuring hemodynamic parameters of transvalvular pressure gradient, ejection jet velocity, or estimating valve orifice area. Recent research has highlighted limitations of these criteria at effectively grading AS in presence of left ventricle (LV) dysfunction. We hypothesized that simulations coupling the aorta and LV could provide meaningful insight into myocardial biomechanical derangements that accompany AS. A realistic finite element model of the human heart with a coupled lumped-parameter circulatory system was used to simulate AS. Finite element analysis was performed with Abaqus FEA. An anisotropic hyperelastic model was assigned to LV passive properties, and a time-varying elastance function governed the LV active response. Global LV myofiber peak systolic stress (mean ± standard deviation) was 9.31 ± 10.33 kPa at baseline, 13.13 ± 10.29 kPa for moderate AS, and 16.18 ± 10.59 kPa for severe AS. Mean LV myofiber peak systolic strains were −22.40 ± 8.73%, −22.24 ± 8.91%, and −21.97 ± 9.18%, respectively. Stress was significantly elevated compared to baseline for moderate (p < 0.01) and severe AS (p < 0.001), and when compared to each other (p < 0.01). Ventricular regions that experienced the greatest systolic stress were (severe AS vs. baseline) basal inferior (39.87 vs. 30.02 kPa; p < 0.01), mid-anteroseptal (32.29 vs. 24.79 kPa; p < 0.001), and apex (27.99 vs. 23.52 kPa; p < 0.001). This data serves as a reference for future studies that will incorporate patient-specific ventricular geometries and material parameters, aiming to correlate LV biomechanics to AS severity.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-09-08 |