6533b7d5fe1ef96bd1263c79

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Commercial Laurus nobilis L. and Syzygium aromaticum L. Men. & Perry essential oils against post-harvest phytopathogenic fungi on rice

Silvia GiménezJosefa RosellóM. Amparo BlázquezM. Pilar Santamarina

subject

FusariumBOTANICASabineneSesquiterpeneEssential oillaw.inventionchemistry.chemical_compound0404 agricultural biotechnologyLaurus nobilisfoodlawBotanyAntifungal activityEssential oilBIOLOGIA VEGETALbiologyPhenylpropanoidfood and beverages04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesbiology.organism_classification040401 food sciencefood.foodSyzygium aromaticumEugenolHorticulturechemistrySyzygiumRiceLaurus nobilisFood Science

description

[EN] Rice is exposed in the field and in stored conditions to a great variety of fungi that can cause a lot of diseases with potential risk to consumers. In the present study, the chemical composition of commercial Laurus nobilis L. and Syzygium aromaticum L. Merr. & Perry essential oils and antifungal activity against five pathogenic fungi isolated from Mediterranean rice grains has been investigated. Thirty-seven compounds accounting for more than 99.5% of the total essential oil were identified by GC and GC/MS. 1,8-Cineole (51.95%), alpha-terpinyl acetate (12.93%) and the monoterpene hydrocarbon sabinene (9.56%) were the main compounds in bay leaf essential oil, while the phenylpropanoid eugenol (88.58%), and the sesquiterpene hydrocarbons beta-caryophyllene (8.13%) and alpha-humulene (2.35%) were found in clove essential oil. Clove essential oils at 300 mu g/mL showed more antifungal effect than bay leaf essential oil against all tested strains. S. aromaticum essential oil showed the best antifungal activity towards Fusarium graminearum and similar antifungal activity compared to pure eugenol against all tested phytopathogenic fungi. In inoculated rice grain, clove essential oil significantly reduced the fungal infection in food so S. aromaticum essential oil could be a good alternative as preservative in stored rice grain. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.040https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.040