6533b7d5fe1ef96bd1264333

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparative analysis of two paradigm bacteriophytochromes reveals opposite functionalities in two-component signaling

Elina MultamäkiRahul NanekarDmitry MorozovTopias LievonenDavid GolonkaWeixiao Yuan WahlgrenBrigitte Stucki-buchliJari RossiVesa P. HytönenSebastian WestenhoffJanne A. IhalainenAndreas MöglichHeikki Takala

subject

Histidine KinaseLightPROTEINSScienceAgrobacteriumHISTIDINE KINASESKinasesMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhotoreceptors MicrobialTRANSDUCTIONArticleCYANOBACTERIAL PHYTOCHROME CPH1ACTIVATIONBacterial ProteinsProtein DomainsCRYSTAL-STRUCTUREPHOSPHORYLATIONX-ray crystallographyBacterial structural biologyQREARRANGEMENTSphotoreceptorsAGROBACTERIUM-TUMEFACIENSPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesINSIGHTSbacterial phytochromesEnzyme mechanismsbacteriaDeinococcus3111 BiomedicineSignal Transduction

description

Bacterial phytochrome photoreceptors usually belong to two-component signaling systems which transmit environmental stimuli to a response regulator through a histidine kinase domain. Phytochromes switch between red light-absorbing and far-red light-absorbing states. Despite exhibiting extensive structural responses during this transition, the model bacteriophytochrome from Deinococcus radiodurans (DrBphP) lacks detectable kinase activity. Here, we resolve this long-standing conundrum by comparatively analyzing the interactions and output activities of DrBphP and a bacteriophytochrome from Agrobacterium fabrum (Agp1). Whereas Agp1 acts as a conventional histidine kinase, we identify DrBphP as a light-sensitive phosphatase. While Agp1 binds its cognate response regulator only transiently, DrBphP does so strongly, which is rationalized at the structural level. Our data pinpoint two key residues affecting the balance between kinase and phosphatase activities, which immediately bears on photoreception and two-component signaling. The opposing output activities in two highly similar bacteriophytochromes suggest the use of light-controllable histidine kinases and phosphatases for optogenetics.

10.1038/s41467-021-24676-7https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/133644