6533b7d5fe1ef96bd126489d
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Salivary gland cancer in Southern Brazil: a prognostic study of 107 cases.
Manoela Domingues MartinsTuany Rafaeli SchmidtCintia CorreaVirgilio Gonzales ZanellaPablo Agustin VargasRicardo Gallicchio KroefStéfanie ThiemePettala RigonVivian Petersen WagnerMarinez Bizarro BarraFelipe Paiva Fonsecasubject
medicine.medical_specialtysjögren syndromeAdenoid cystic carcinomamedicine.medical_treatmentsalivary glandsPerineural invasionGastroenterologyMucoepidermoid carcinomaInternal medicineOral Cancer and Potentially malignant disordersmedicineHumansIntermediate GradexerostomiaGeneral DentistryUNESCO:CIENCIAS MÉDICASRetrospective StudiesChemotherapySalivary glandbusiness.industryResearchNeck dissectionmedicine.diseasePrognosisSalivary Gland Neoplasmsmedicine.anatomical_structureOtorhinolaryngologySalivary gland cancerSurgeryNeoplasm Recurrence LocalbusinessBrazildescription
Background Salivary gland cancers (SGC) represent an uncommon group of heterogeneous tumors. We performed a retrospective survey of SGC diagnosed in a reference center for treatment of malignant tumors from the south of Brazil aiming to determine the prognostic value of demographic, clinic and pathologic features. Material and Methods Cases diagnosed as SGC between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively collected. Medical records were examined to extract demographic, clinic, pathologic and follow-up information. Results One-hundred and seven cases of SGC were identified. The most common SGC were mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) (n = 39) followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) (n = 29). Among AdCCs, 55.2% of cases were classified as cribriform, 27.6% as tubular and 17.2% as solid. The tubular subtype had the highest percentage of cases with perineural invasion (p=0.01). Among MEC, 61.5% of cases were classified as low grade, 15.4% as intermediate grade and 19.9% as high grade. Low grade MEC had the lowest percentage of cases with perineural invasion (p=0.04). The 5-year survival for loco-regional control, disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival were 75%, 70% and 84%, respectively. The following features were associated with poor DFS: advanced age (p=0.03), rural residency (p=0.01), being a smoker or former smoker (p=0.01), pain (p=0.03), nodal metastasis (p <0.001), need for chemotherapy (p=0.02), neck dissection (p=0.04), perineural invasion (p=0.01), and being diagnosed with AdCC compared to MEC (p=0.02). Conclusions The clinco-demographic and pathologic features identified as prognostic factors reveal the profile of patients at increased risk of recurrence and who would benefit from closer follow-up. Key words:Head and neck neoplasms, neoplasms, glandular and epithelial, rare diseases, epidemiology, follow up studies.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-08-17 | Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal |