6533b7d5fe1ef96bd12652f3
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) vs. non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018
Tyler J. FraumAllan TsungMuhammad NaeemRoberto CannellaRoberto CannellaAnup S. ShettyRichard TsaiAmber SalterDaniel R. LudwigAlessandro FurlanKathryn J. FowlerMaverick LeblancAmir A. BorhaniDavid H. Ballardsubject
AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyCirrhosisCarcinoma HepatocellularUrologyMalignancySensitivity and SpecificityArticle030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineImage Interpretation Computer-AssistedmedicineHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingIn patientLiver imagingAgedRetrospective StudiesAged 80 and overCirrhosiRadiological and Ultrasound Technologybusiness.industryLiver NeoplasmsGastroenterologyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective cohort studyHepatologyMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingInterrater reliabilitydigestive system diseasesCombined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA)030220 oncology & carcinogenesisHepatocellular carcinomaCohortLI-RADSFemaleRadiologybusinessTomography X-Ray ComputedIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)Algorithmsdescription
PURPOSE: The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was created to standardize the diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and has undergone multiple revisions including a recent update in 2018 (v2018). The primary aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance and interrater reliability (IRR) of LI-RADS v2018 for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary hepatic malignancy in patients ‘at-risk’ for HCC. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of changes introduced in the v2018 diagnostic algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study combined a 10-year experience of pathologically-proven primary liver malignancies from two large liver transplant centers. Two blinded readers independently evaluated each lesion and assigned a LI-RADS diagnostic category, additionally scoring all relevant imaging features. Changes in category based on the reader-provided features and the new v2018 criteria were assessed by a study coordinator. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 105 HCCs and 73 non-HCC primarily liver malignancies. LI-RADS had a high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC (89% and 90% for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively), and IRR was moderate to substantial for final LI-RADS category and most features. Revision of the LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in very few changes (5 [2.8%] and 3 [1.7%] for reader 1 and reader 2, respectively) in overall lesion classification. CONCLUSION: LI-RADS diagnostic categories and features had moderate to substantial IRR and high specificity for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy. Revision of LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm resulted in reclassification of very few lesions.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-06-01 |