6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1265d0f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Comparison of bronchial and nasal allergen provocation in children and adolescents with bronchial asthma and house dust mite sensitization.

subject

description

Background Bronchial allergen provocation (BAP) is an established tool for the diagnosis of allergy in patients with asthma, but its use is limited by the potential risk of severe asthmatic reactions. Nasal provocation testing (NPT) may be an alternative safe method and does not require sophisticated equipment. Objective The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the concordance of both methods in patients with asthma and house dust mite (HDM) sensitization. Methods A total of 112 patients with HDM sensitization underwent BAP and had the following parameters analysed: decrease in FEV1, exhaled NO, and total and specific IgE. Within 12 weeks, NPT with HDM was performed in 74 patients with a median age of 9 years (range, 5-16 years). The results were evaluated using the Lebel score which quantifies major symptoms like rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezes and minor symptoms, such as pruritus, conjunctivitis and pharyngitis. Results Fifty-seven of 74 patients had an early asthmatic reaction, of which 41 were identified using the Lebel score. The Lebel score had a sensitivity of 71.9% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 89.1%. In addition, an eNO ≥ 10 ppb (AUC 0.78), a specific IgE Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus ≥ 25.6 kU/L (AUC 0.76) and a specific IgE Dermatophagoides farinae ≥ 6.6 kU/L (AUC 0.78) were good predictors of an early asthmatic reaction. Conclusion A sequential use of NPT prior to BAP is justified to establish the relevance of HDM allergy. In patients with a negative NPT, BAP is still recommended to rule out a HDM-induced asthmatic reaction.