6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1265d3a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Validation of a Short Form of Job Crafting Scale in a Spanish Sample

Beatriz SoraEsther García-buadesAmparo Caballer

subject

AdultEmploymentMaleLinguistics and LanguagePsychometrics050109 social psychologySample (statistics)Language and LinguisticsStructural equation modelingGoodness of fit0502 economics and businessStatisticsHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesWork PerformanceGeneral Psychology05 social sciencesDiscriminant validityReproducibility of ResultsMiddle AgedExploratory factor analysisConfirmatory factor analysisJob DescriptionConvergent validitySpainJob performanceFemaleFactor Analysis StatisticalPsychology050203 business & management

description

AbstractApplications of job crafting are widespread in the professional practice. In an attempt to measure this phenomenon, Tims, Bakker and Derks (2012) developed a Job Crafting Scale based on the Job Demand-Resources model (JD-R) and validated it in a Dutch sample. However, its application to other cultural contexts presented some difficulties. The present work aimed to validate a shorter version of scale by Tims et al. (2012) in a Spanish sample (n = 1,647). The data were randomly split in two independent subsamples (Sample 1: Explorative; Sample 2: Confirmative). The exploratory factor analysis showed a three-factor structure. Through a confirmatory factor analysis, the four-dimensionality structure of the original scale was replicated. In fact, the four-factor solution presented better goodness of fit indices than the alternative one-factor model, χ2(48) = 192.70, p < .01; AGFI = .94; NNFI = .93; RMR = .05; RMSEA = .06. Alpha reliabilities were acceptable for increasing structural job resources (α = .75), decreasing hindering job demands (α = .64), increasing social job resources (α = .78) and increasing challenging job demands (α = .77). Convergent validity was appropriate for three of the four dimensions, because each construct’s AVE were around .50 and each construct’s Composite Reliability were around .70. Decreasing hindering job demands presented more limited values (CR = .65; AVE = .40). In addition, the four job crafting dimensions presented significant correlations with job performance (range –.09 to .42) and personal growth (ranging from –.09 to .45). Finally, the squared correlations between factors were lower than the square root of AVE, which confirmed discriminant validity.

https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.52