6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1265e07
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Glaucoma Patients and Healthy Subjects
Esther M. HoffmannFranz H. GrusNorbert PfeifferManfred BerresL. Barleonsubject
AdultMaleApplanation tonometryIntraocular pressuremedicine.medical_specialtygenetic structuresEye diseaseVisual AcuityGlaucomaGoldmann applanation tonometryCorneaTonometry OcularOphthalmologyHumansMedicineProspective StudiesIntraocular PressureAgedUltrasonographyAged 80 and overbusiness.industryLimits of agreementHealthy subjectsReproducibility of ResultsGlaucomaMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseeye diseasesOphthalmologyCross-Sectional StudiesVisual Field TestsFemaleOcular Hypertensionsense organsbusinessdescription
To investigate the agreement in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by dynamic contour tonometry PASCAL (DCT-PASCAL) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes with different central corneal thickness (CCT).Prospective cross-sectional study.In a randomized order, three consecutive IOP measurements were performed on 197 eyes of 107 subjects by one examiner using both DCT-PASCAL and GAT on all eyes. Furthermore, ultrasonic pachymetry was performed. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) was determined to compare IOP readings between DCT-PASCAL and GAT. Regression-based Bland and Altman analysis was used to evaluate agreement between the instruments.Mean IOP values obtained by both instruments were significantly correlated in healthy and glaucoma eyes (all healthy eyes [n = 66]: r = 0.8, P.001, all glaucoma eyes [n = 131]: r = 0.96, P.001). Neither GAT nor DCT-PASCAL showed a significant correlation with CCT (GAT: all eyes: r = 0.009, P = .9, DCT-PASCAL: all eyes: r = -0.05, P = .5). Bland and Altman analysis revealed the existence of proportional bias. Thus, 95% limits of agreement between the instruments varied with the actual IOP measurement.DCT-PASCAL and GAT revealed a strong correlation in IOP measurements between glaucoma and healthy eyes. However, the analysis of agreement indicated some discrepancies between the instruments. Measurements with both GAT and DCT-PASCAL were not correlated with central corneal thickness.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2006-01-25 | American Journal of Ophthalmology |