6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1266635

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The PHES battery does not detect all cirrhotic patients with early neurological deficits, which are different in different patients.

Juan José GarcésAmparo UriosAlba Mangas-losadaCarmina MontoliuRaquel García-garcíaMiguel A. SerraCarla Giménez-garzóVicente FelipoEmilio SoriaRemedios Giner-duránDesamparados Escudero-garcíaOlga González-lopez

subject

Liver CirrhosisMalePathologyPediatricsCirrhosisPsychometricsSocial Scienceslcsh:MedicineNeuropsychological Tests0302 clinical medicineMedicine and Health SciencesPsychologyCluster AnalysisAttentionlcsh:ScienceHepatic encephalopathyCognitive Impairmenteducation.field_of_studyMultidisciplinaryCognitive NeurologyLiver DiseasesMiddle AgedNeurologyCirrhosisOncologyFemale030211 gastroenterology & hepatologyResearch Articlemedicine.medical_specialtyPsychometricsCognitive NeurosciencePopulationGastroenterology and HepatologyCarcinomas03 medical and health sciencesNeuropsychologyGastrointestinal TumorsmedicineHumanseducationNeuropsychological TestingAgedWorking memorybusiness.industryGold standardlcsh:RCognitive PsychologyCase-control studyBiology and Life SciencesCancers and NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsHepatocellular Carcinomamedicine.diseasePatient Outcome AssessmentCase-Control StudiesHepatic EncephalopathyStroop TestCognitive Sciencelcsh:QbusinessPsychomotor Performance030217 neurology & neurosurgeryNeuroscienceFollow-Up StudiesStroop effect

description

Background and aims The psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) is the “gold standard” for minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) diagnosis. Some reports suggest that some cirrhotic patients “without” MHE according to PHES show neurological deficits and other reports that neurological alterations are not homogeneous in all cirrhotic patients. This work aimed to assess whether: 1) a relevant proportion of cirrhotic patients show neurological deficits not detected by PHES; 2) cirrhotic patients with mild neurological deficits are a homogeneous population or may be classified in sub-groups according to specific deficits. Methods Cirrhotic patients “without” (n = 56) or “with” MHE (n = 41) according to PHES and controls (n = 52) performed psychometric tests assessing attention, concentration, mental processing speed, working memory and bimanual and visuomotor coordination. Heterogeneity of neurological alterations was analysed using Hierarchical Clustering Analysis. Results PHES classified as “with” MHE 42% of patients. Around 40% of patients “without” MHE according to PHES fail two psychometric tests. Oral SDMT, d2, bimanual and visuo-motor coordination tests are failed by 54, 51, 51 and 43% of patients, respectively. The earliest neurological alterations are different for different patients. Hierarchical clustering analysis shows that patients “without” MHE according to PHES may be classified in clusters according to the tests failed. In some patients coordination impairment appear before cognitive impairment while in others concentration and attention deficits appear before. Conclusions PHES is not sensitive enough to detect early neurological alterations in a relevant proportion of cirrhotic patients. Oral SDMT, d2 and bimanual and visuo-motor coordination tests are more sensitive. The earliest neurological alterations are different in different cirrhotic patients. These data also have relevant clinical implications. Patients classified as “without MHE” by PHES belonging to clusters 3 and 4 in our study have a high risk of suffering clinical complications, including overt HE and must be diagnosed and clinically followed.

10.1371/journal.pone.0171211http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5287470?pdf=render