6533b7d6fe1ef96bd1266671

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in coronary calcium score and CT coronary angiography image data sets: comparison of attenuation values, thickness and volumes

Filippo CademartiriFilippo CademartiriDomenico AlbanoPatrizia ToiaEmanuele GrassedonioErica MaffeiAlfonso FarruggiaMassimo MidiriLudovico La GruttaA. PalmeriSalvatore VitabileMassimo Galia

subject

MaleCoronary angiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyAdipose tissueCoronary Artery Disease030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyCoronary AngiographySensitivity and Specificity030218 nuclear medicine & medical imagingCoronary artery disease03 medical and health sciencesImaging Three-Dimensional0302 clinical medicineHounsfield scalemedicineHumansRadiology Nuclear Medicine and imagingVascular CalcificationAdiposityComputed tomography angiographyFull Papermedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industryReproducibility of ResultsMean ageGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseCoronary Calcium ScoreAdipose Tissueepicardial adipose tissue CT coronary angiographyEpicardial adipose tissueRadiographic Image Interpretation Computer-AssistedFemaleSettore MED/36 - Diagnostica Per Immagini E RadioterapiabusinessNuclear medicinePericardiumAlgorithms

description

The aim of the study was to compare epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) characteristics assessed with coronary calcium score (CS) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA) image data sets.In 76 patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years) who underwent CS and CTCA owing to suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), EAT was quantified in terms of density (Hounsfield units), thickness and volume. The EAT volume was extracted with a semi-automatic software.A moderate correlation was found between EAT density in CS and CTCA image data sets (-100 ± 19 HU vs -70 ± 24 HU; p  0.05, r = 0.55). The distribution of EAT was not symmetrical with a maximal thickness at the right atrioventricular groove (14.2 ± 5.3 mm in CS, 15.7 ± 5 mm in CTCA; p  0.05, r = 0.76). The EAT volume resulted as 122 ± 50 cm(3) in CS and 86 ± 40 cm(3) in CTCA (Δ = 30%, p  0.05, r = 0.92). After adjustment for post-contrast EAT attenuation difference (Δ = 30 HU), the volume was 101 ± 47 cm(3) (Δ = 17%, p  0.05, r = 0.92). Based on EAT volume median values, no differences were found between groups with smaller and larger volumes in terms of Agatston score and CAD severity.CS and CTCA image data sets may be equally employed for EAT assessment; however, an underestimation of volume is found with the latter acquisition even after post-contrast attenuation adjustment.EAT may be measured by processing either the CS or CTCA image data sets.

https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150773