6533b7d7fe1ef96bd1269005

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Brainstem evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in differential diagnosis of intracranial hypotension.

Raffaella FranciottiMarco OnofrjCamilla FerranteVincenzo Di StefanoLaura BonanniRoberta TeleseMassimo Caulo

subject

AdultMalegenetic structuresHearing Loss SensorineuralChiari malformationIntracranial HypotensionSensitivity and Specificity050105 experimental psychologyDiagnosis Differential03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePhysiology (medical)otorhinolaryngologic diseasesmedicineEvoked Potentials Auditory Brain StemHumans0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesIn patientIntracranial HypotensionChiari malformationmedicine.diagnostic_testbusiness.industry05 social sciencesBrainMagnetic resonance imagingGeneral MedicineMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingHyperintensityArnold-Chiari MalformationSensorineural hearing lossNeurologyBrainstem acoustic evoked potentialSensorineural hearing lossSettore MED/26 - NeurologiaFemaleNeurology (clinical)BrainstemDifferential diagnosisNuclear medicinebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Summary Objective To compare brainstem acoustic evoked potentials (BAEP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differential diagnosis of intracranial hypotension (IH), Chiari malformation (CM) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Methods BAEP were recorded in 18 IH, 18 CM, 20 SNHL patients and 52 controls. MRI were acquired in all IH and CM patients. Results Abnormal BAEP were observed in 94% of IH patients, in 33% of CM and 70% of SNHL patients. After recovery from IH, BAEP abnormalities disappeared. Internal auditory canal (IAC) MRI abnormalities were described in 88% of IH patients. MRI signs of IH were observed in 33–78% in IH patients, but the most frequent MRI sign was 8th nerve T2 hyperintensity, with contrast enhancement in T1 sequences. This finding, combined with wave I latency, yielded highest specificity and sensitivity for IH diagnosis. Conclusions Our study points out how IH can be effectively distinguished from CM and SNHL through the contribution of neurophysiology and MRI; in particular, evaluation of the 8th nerve achieves a high sensitivity and specificity in patients with IH. Further studies are required to examine the combined use of BAEP recordings ad MRI in diagnosis and monitoring of patients affected by IH.

10.1016/j.neucli.2019.04.003https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31101389