6533b7d9fe1ef96bd126ce01
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Changing Trends in Drug Prescription and Causes of Treatment Discontinuation of First Biologic Over Ten Years in Psoriasis in the Spanish Biobadaderm Registry
En Nombre Del Grupo BiobadadermD P Ruiz-genaoIsabel BelinchónIgnacio García-dovalF.j. Gómez-garcíaJ.l. Sánchez-carazoRaquel RiveraRafael Botella-estradaM. Ferrán-farrésMar Llamas-velascoO Baniandrés-rodríguezGregorio CarreteroJ Vilar-alejoJosé Manuel CarrascosaE. DaudénMercè AlsinaEnrique Herrera-ceballosEnrique Herrera-acostaL RodriguezJosé L. López-estebaranzAntonio Sahuquillo-torralbaP. De La CuevaC García-donosoCarlos FerrándizMiguel ÁNgel Descalzosubject
Drugmedicine.medical_specialtyHistologyBiologicmedia_common.quotation_subjectDiscontinuationDermatologyBiologic treatmentPathology and Forensic Medicine030207 dermatology & venereal diseases03 medical and health sciencesDrug withdrawal0302 clinical medicinePsoriasisUstekinumabTrendmedicinePsoriasisMedical prescriptionIntensive care medicineAdverse effectmedia_commonbusiness.industryBiobadadermmedicine.diseaseDiscontinuationTreatment030220 oncology & carcinogenesisbusinessmedicine.drugdescription
Background and objectives: Current psoriasis guidelines do not usually include recommendations about first line classical or biologic treatment. The objectives of this study were: to describe shifts in the prescription of the first biological treatment, and to compare treatment withdrawal and rates of adverse events over ten years. Material and methods: Biobadaderm registry was analyzed to describe: first biological prescription in bio-naive patients, adverse events rate and reasons for drug withdrawal comparing three periods of time (2008-2010, 2011-2014, 2015-2018). Results: Anti-TNF drugs were the most prescribed biological drug from 2008 to 2010. Ustekinumab has become the most prescribed first biologic since 2014. The main reasons for drug discontinuation were adverse events, lack of efficacy and remission. In each period any treatment was less likely to be discontinued due to any of these three reasons comparing to the previous period. Conclusions: The present study identifies trends in prescription of the first biological antipsoriatic drug in clinical practice from 2008 to 2018. It suggests that we have become more comfortable with the safety profile and more exigent with the efficacy of the drugs. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of AEDV.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-11-01 |