6533b7dbfe1ef96bd126f738

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice in the prospective, observational CORRELATE study.

Emmanuelle DochyJean-philippe MetgesLeopold ÖHlerLone Nørgård PetersenCorrelate InvestigatorsAlfredo FalconeBeatriz García ParedesAndrés CervantesJan Willem B. De GrootFrancesca BergamoJaw-yuan WangJuan Manuel O'connorSabine Fiala-buskiesMichel Ducreux

subject

0301 basic medicineMaleCancer ResearchLung NeoplasmsColorectal cancerPyridinesGTP Phosphohydrolaseschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineObservational studyProspective StudiesNeoplasm MetastasisFatiguePeritoneal NeoplasmsRegorafenibAged 80 and overLiver NeoplasmsCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisHypertensionFemaleHand-Foot SyndromeColorectal NeoplasmsAdultProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafmedicine.medical_specialtyBone NeoplasmsPlaceboProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)03 medical and health sciencesYoung AdultRegorafenibInternal medicinemedicineHumansAdverse effectSurvival analysisAgedAdverse effectsbusiness.industryPhenylurea CompoundsCarcinomaCancerMembrane ProteinsSurvival analysismedicine.disease030104 developmental biologychemistryObservational studyLymph NodesbusinessAdverse effects; Observational study; Regorafenib; Survival analysis

description

Abstract Background Regorafenib prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in phase III trials. We conducted an observational study of regorafenib for patients with mCRC in real-world clinical practice. Methods The international, prospective, CORRELATE study recruited patients with mCRC previously treated with approved therapies, for whom the decision to treat with regorafenib was made by the treating physician according to the local health authority approved label. The primary objective was safety, assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03). Results A total of 1037 patients were treated. The median age was 65 years (range: 24–93); 87% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, 56% of patients had KRAS, 7% had NRAS and 4% had BRAF mutations. The initial regorafenib dose was 160 mg/day in 57% of patients. The most common grade III or IV drug-related TEAEs were fatigue (9%), hand–foot skin reaction (7%) and hypertension (6%). Drug-related grade V (fatal) TEAEs occurred in 1% of patients. Dose reductions for drug-related TEAEs occurred in 24% of patients. Median OS was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.2–8.3), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.8–3.0). Conclusions In this real-world, observational study of patients with mCRC, the regorafenib toxicity profile was similar to that reported in phase III trials. The starting dose for almost half of patients was less than the approved 160-mg dose, and the median OS and PFS were in the range observed in phase III trials. Trial registration: NCT02042144.

10.1016/j.ejca.2019.09.015https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31698328