6533b7dbfe1ef96bd126febf

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the General Health Questionnaire-12 in a German and a Colombian population sample

Carolyn FinckJeremy C. YoungElmar BrählerElmar BrählerHeide GlaesmerMatthias RomppelAndreas Hinz

subject

050103 clinical psychologyeducation.field_of_studyPsychometrics05 social sciencesPopulationResponse biasCross-cultural studieslanguage.human_language030227 psychiatryGerman03 medical and health sciencesPsychiatry and Mental healthMental distress0302 clinical medicineStatisticslanguageEconometrics0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesGeneral Health QuestionnaireeducationEquivalence (measure theory)Mathematics

description

While the General Health Questionnaire, 12-item version (GHQ-12) has been widely used in cross-cultural comparisons, rigorous tests of the measurement equivalence of different language versions are still lacking. Thus, our study aims at investigating configural, metric and scalar invariance across the German and the Spanish version of the GHQ-12 in two population samples. The GHQ-12 was applied in two large-scale population-based samples in Germany (N = 1,977) and Colombia (N = 1,500). To investigate measurement equivalence, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted in both samples. In the German sample mean GHQ-12 total scores were higher than in the Colombian sample. A one-factor model including response bias on the negatively worded items showed superior fit in the German and the Colombian sample; thus both versions of the GHQ-12 showed configural invariance. Factor loadings and intercepts were not equal across both samples; thus GHQ-12 showed no metric and scalar invariance. As both versions of the GHQ-12 did not show measurement equivalence, it is not recommendable to compare both measures and to conclude that mental distress is higher in the German sample, although we do not know if the differences are attributable to measurement problems or represent a real difference in mental distress. The study underlines the importance of measurement equivalence in cross-cultural comparisons.

https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1532