6533b7dbfe1ef96bd127018e
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Early Impact of Pulmonary Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Quality of Life:Benefit for Patients With Low Initial Scores (STRIPE Trial)
Felix MommSonja AdebahrSonja AdebahrGerhild BeckerV. Duncker-rohrEleni GkikaUrsula NestleNele SchräderJan GaertnerTanja Schimek-jaschMarlene HechtnerAnca-ligia GrosuAnca-ligia GrosuKlaus Kaiersubject
Male0301 basic medicinePulmonary and Respiratory Medicinemedicine.medical_specialtyLung NeoplasmsHealth StatusRadiosurgeryEmotional function03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineQuality of lifeSurveys and QuestionnairesInternal medicinemedicineHumansProspective StudiesAgedLungbusiness.industryCancerPrognosismedicine.diseasehumanitiesKarnofsky index030104 developmental biologymedicine.anatomical_structureOncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisCharlson comorbidity indexQuality of LifeFemaleDose Fractionation RadiationbusinessStereotactic body radiotherapyFollow-Up Studiesdescription
Abstract Introduction Quality of life (QoL) of comorbid patients with pulmonary malignancies is a key issue in considering fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) indication. This study investigates the early impact of SBRT on QoL. Methods One hundred patients with pulmonary lesions were treated with SBRT from February 2011 to December 2014 within the prospective, monocenter, phase II STRIPE trial. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core module (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the QLQ-LC13 lung cancer-specific questionnaire were used to evaluate QoL before, 2 and 7 weeks after SBRT, then every 3 months for 2 years. We report on the analysis of early changes from baseline to 7-week follow-up exam. Impact of patient- and treatment-related factors on the change in QoL was analyzed. Results QoL was assessed in 97 patients; compliance was 92% and 85% at baseline and 7 weeks after SBRT, respectively. No clinically relevant changes greater than or equal to 10 in the QoL/global health status (GHS), function scores and inquired symptoms were observed. Patients with baseline QoL below the median showed clinically relevant improvement in QoL/GHS (Δ16.7 ± 25.3, p = 0.003), emotional function (Δ14.4 ± 25.4, p = 0.013), and fatigue (Δ -10.1 ± 26.5, p = 0.089) in contrast to patients with high initial scores. No changes were observed in the dichotomized subgroups of initial Karnofsky index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, diagnosis, and tumor localization. Conclusions In short-term follow-up, QoL is well maintained after pulmonary SBRT. Especially patients with low initial QoL/GHS scores show benefit from SBRT with respect to QoL.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-03-01 | Journal of Thoracic Oncology |