6533b7dbfe1ef96bd12702a5

RESEARCH PRODUCT

The role of the aquifer in soil CO2 degassing in volcanic peripheral areas: A case study of Stromboli Island (Italy)

Claudio InguaggiatoClaudio InguaggiatoIole Serena DilibertoFabio VitaLorenzo Calderone

subject

Hydrologygeographygeography.geographical_feature_category010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences2GeologySoil scienceAquiferin waterPartial pressure010502 geochemistry & geophysics01 natural sciencesfluxVolcano-hydrothermal systemSoil temperatureFlux (metallurgy)VolcanoGeochemistry and PetrologypCOMagmaSoil COGeologyGas-water interaction0105 earth and related environmental sciences

description

Abstract The peripheral area of Stromboli Island, Italy, named “Scari”, was continuously studied between January 2009 and December 2010. Data on soil CO 2 flux and the partial pressure of CO 2 (pCO 2 ) in equilibrium with the thermal aquifer linked to the magmatic system are presented. Soil CO 2 fluxes range from 20 to 370 g m − 2  d − 1 and have been strongly affected by soil temperature variations. Soil CO 2 flux data were filtered with respect to the soil temperature and the calculated values, called “residuals”, were considered to detect changes induced by the magmatic system. The pCO 2 values change in a wide range from 0.03 to 0.6 (atm), showing rapid variations. The results of this study show that in the volcanic peripheral area, the degassing process of soil CO 2 is determined not only by the CO 2 released directly from the magma but also by gas–water interactions in the aquifer. The aquifer is able to dissolve the high amount of CO 2 discharged by the magmatic system. Moreover, the “residuals” of CO 2 flux diffused from the soil show a delay on the order of ~ 1 month with respect to the pCO 2 in equilibrium with the aquifer. The soil CO 2 flux is therefore not directly linked to the uprising of magmatic CO 2 but instead depends on the CO 2 discharged from the aquifer, which buffers and modulates the volatile changes released by the magmatic system.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.12.017