6533b7dbfe1ef96bd12709c1
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position: A scoping review.
Alessandra MoscarelliAntonino GiarratanoCesare GregorettiMariachiara IppolitoEnrico BaldiAndrea CortegianiPasquale IozzoGiulia Catalisanosubject
Open sciencemedicine.medical_specialtySupine positionProne CPRmedicine.medical_treatmenteducationMEDLINEReverse CPRArticlePatient Positioning03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineHealth careProne PositionMedicineHumansCardiopulmonary resuscitationIntensive care medicineProtocol (science)business.industryCOVID-19030208 emergency & critical care medicineGeneral MedicineCardiopulmonary ResuscitationAdvanced life supportHeart ArrestProne positionEmergency Medicinebusinessdescription
Introduction The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 brought to the fore prone positioning as treatment for patients with acute respiratory failure. With the increasing number of patients in prone position, both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated, cardiac arrest in this position is more likely to occur. This scoping review aimed to summarize the available evidence on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in prone position (‘reverse CPR’) and knowledge or research gaps to be further evaluated. The protocol of this scoping review was prospectively registered on 10th May 2020 in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nfuh9). Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and pre-print repositories (bioRxiv and medRxiv) for simulation, pre-clinical and clinical studies on reverse CPR until 31st May 2020. Results We included 1 study on manikins, 31 case reports (29 during surgery requiring prone position) and 2 nonrandomized studies describing reverse CPR. No studies were found regarding reverse CPR in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions Even if the algorithms provided by the guidelines on basic and advanced life support remain valid in cardiac arrest in prone position, differences exist in the methods of performing CPR. There is no clear evidence of superiority in terms of effectiveness of reverse compared to supine CPR in patients with cardiac arrest occurring in prone position. The quality of evidence is low and knowledge gaps (e.g. protocols, training of healthcare personnel, devices for skill acquisition) should be fulfilled by further research. Meanwhile, a case-by-case evaluation of patient and setting characteristics should guide the decision on how to start CPR in such cases.
| year | journal | country | edition | language |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | The American journal of emergency medicine |