6533b7dbfe1ef96bd12709e4

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Deep-Time Phylogenetic Clustering of Extinctions in an Evolutionarily Dynamic Clade (Early Jurassic Ammonites)

Christian MeisterClotilde HardyRémi LaffontEmmanuel FaraJean-louis DommerguesPascal Neige

subject

Evolutionary ProcessesEcological MetricsCombined uselcsh:MedicineBiologyForms of EvolutionExtinction BiologicalPhylogeneticsPhyletic PatternsAnimalsCluster AnalysisEvolutionary SystematicsCladelcsh:ScienceBiologyDeep timeSpecies ExtinctionPhylogeny[ SDU.STU.PG ] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/PaleontologyAmmoniteEvolutionary BiologyMultidisciplinaryExtinctionModels StatisticalPhylogenetic treeEcologyEcologyFossilslcsh:RPaleontologysocial sciencesBiological Evolutionlanguage.human_languagehumanities[ SDV.BID.EVO ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE]CephalopodaPhylogenetic PatternExtinction RisklanguageEarth SciencesMacroevolutionlcsh:QPaleoecologyPaleobiologyResearch Article

description

7 pages; International audience; Conservation biologists and palaeontologists are increasingly investigating the phylogenetic distribution of extinctions and its evolutionary consequences. However, the dearth of palaeontological studies on that subject and the lack of methodological consensus hamper our understanding of that major evolutionary phenomenon. Here we address this issue by (i) reviewing the approaches used to quantify the phylogenetic selectivity of extinctions and extinction risks; (ii) investigating with a high-resolution dataset whether extinctions and survivals were phylogenetically clustered among early Pliensbachian (Early Jurassic) ammonites; (iii) exploring the phylogenetic and temporal maintenance of this signal. We found that ammonite extinctions were significantly clumped phylogenetically, a pattern that prevailed throughout the 6.6 Myr-long early Pliensbachian interval. Such a phylogenetic conservatism did not alter - or may even have promoted - the evolutionary success of this major cephalopod clade. However, the comparison of phylogenetic autocorrelation among studies remains problematic because the notion of phylogenetic conservatism is scale-dependent and the intensity of the signal is sensitive to temporal resolution. We recommend a combined use of Moran's I, Pearson's ϕ and Fritz and Purvis' D statistics because they highlight different facets of the phylogenetic pattern of extinctions and/or survivals.

10.1371/journal.pone.0037977http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3360673