6533b7ddfe1ef96bd1275474
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Different methods of cell quantification can lead to different results: a comparison of digital methods using a pilot study of dendritic cells in HIV-positive patients
M-b Van HeerdenD-t FernandesA-c RibeiroSantos-silva ArT. O. BrandãoR GondakW-f Van HeerdenM-a LopesCésar RiveraP-a VargasE-s Mellosubject
Pathologymedicine.medical_specialtyCellHIV InfectionsPilot Projects03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineCarcinomamedicineHumansStage (cooking)General DentistryReproducibilityOral Medicine and Pathologybusiness.industryResearchReproducibility of ResultsDigital pathologyDendritic Cells030206 dentistry:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]medicine.diseaseCell countingmedicine.anatomical_structureOtorhinolaryngologyUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASCarcinoma Squamous CellMann–Whitney U testImmunohistochemistrySurgerybusinessdescription
Background Although new digital pathology tools have improved the positive cell quantification, there is a heterogeneity of the quantification methods in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate and propose a novel dendritic cells quantification method in squamous cell carcinoma comparing it with a conventional quantification method. Material and Methods Twenty-six squamous cell carcinomas HIV-positive cases affecting the oropharynx, lips and oral cavity were selected. Immunohistochemistry for CD1a, CD83, and CD207 was performed. The immunohistochemical stains were evaluated by automated examination using a positive pixel count algorithm. A conventional quantification method (unspecific area method; UA) and a novel method (specific area method; SA) were performed obtaining the corresponding density of positive dendritic cells for the intratumoral and peritumoral regions. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the influence of the quantification methods on the positive cell counting according to the evaluated regions. Data were subjected to the ANOVA and Student’s t-test to verify the influence of the tumour location, stage, histological grade, and amount of inflammation on the dendritic cells density counting. Results The cell quantification method affected the dendritic cells counting independently of the evaluated region (P-value <0.05). Significant differences between methods were also observed according to the tumour features evaluations. Conclusions The positive cell quantification method influences the dendritic cells density results. Unlike the conventional method (UA method), the novel SA method avoids non-target areas included in the hotspots improving the reliability and reproducibility of the density cell quantification. Key words:Cell counts, immunohistochemistry, dendritic cells, HIV, head and neck neoplasms.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-09-27 | Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal |