6533b7defe1ef96bd1276811

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Anidulafungin dosing in critically ill patients with continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration

María Asunción ParraDavid NavarroCarlos FerrandoJosé Ramón AzanzaGerardo AguilarRafael BadenesAndrea GutierrezGergana GenchevaAmanda MiñanaJosé A. CarbonellF. Javier BeldaFrancisco MartíCarlos Garcia-marquezJaume PuigBelén Sádaba

subject

Microbiology (medical)Antifungal AgentsCritical Illnessmedicine.medical_treatmentHemodiafiltrationAnidulafunginLoading doselaw.inventionSepsisEchinocandinsPharmacokineticslawmedicineHumansCandidiasis InvasivePharmacology (medical)Trough ConcentrationRenal replacement therapyDosingCandidaPharmacologybusiness.industrybacterial infections and mycosesmedicine.diseaseIntensive care unitIntensive Care UnitsInfectious DiseasesAnesthesiaAnidulafunginbusinessmedicine.drug

description

Background Anidulafungin is indicated as a first-line treatment for invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. In the intensive care unit, sepsis is the main cause of acute renal failure, and treatment with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has increased in recent years. Antimicrobial pharmacokinetics is affected by CRRT, but few studies have addressed the optimal dosage for anidulafungin during CRRT. Patients and methods We included 12 critically ill patients who received continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration to treat acute renal failure. Anidulafungin was infused on 3 consecutive days, starting with a loading dose (200 mg) on Day 1, and doses of 100 mg on Days 2 and 3. Blood and ultradiafiltrate samples were collected on Day 3 (during steady-state) before, and at regular intervals after, the infusion had started. Anidulafungin concentrations were determined with HPLC. Results On Day 3, peak plasma concentrations with the 100 mg dose were 6.2 ± 1.7 mg/L and 7.1 ± 1.9 mg/L in the arterial and venous samples, respectively. The mean, pre-filter trough concentration was 3.0 ± 0.6 mg/L. The mean AUC0-24 values for plasma anidulafungin were 93.9 ± 19.4 and 104.1 ± 20.3mg·h/L in the arterial and venous samples, respectively. There was no adsorption to synthetic surfaces, and the anidulafungin concentration in the ultradiafiltrate was below the limit of detection. Conclusion The influence of CRRT on anidulafungin elimination appeared to be negligible. Therefore, we recommend no adjustments to the anidulafungin dose for patients receiving CRRT.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt542