6533b820fe1ef96bd127a35f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Allosterism of Nautilus pompilius hemocyanin as deduced from 8 Å cryo-EM structures obtained under oxy and deoxy conditions

Christos GatsogiannisUlrich MeissnerFrank DepoixJürgen MarklArne Moeller

subject

Turn (biochemistry)CrystallographyMolecular modelCryo-electron microscopyProtein subunitmedicine.medical_treatmentmedicineCooperativityHemocyaninContext (language use)AnatomyBiologyOxygen binding

description

Hemocyanins are the blue copper-containing respiratory proteins of many molluscs. Nautilus pompilius hemocyanin (NpH) is a cylindrical decamer composed of ten copies of a 350 kDa polypeptide subunit, in turn consisting of seven O2-binding functional units (FUs, termed NpH-a to NpH-g). Ten copies of the subunit segment NpH-a to NpH-f form the cylinder wall (ca. 35 nm in diameter), whereas the ten copies of NpH-g build the internal collar. Recently we published a 9A cryo-EM structure and molecular model of NpH that solved the principal architecture of this protein [1]. Hemocyanins are highly allosteric, and the cooperativity of oxygen binding should be transferred between functional units by conformational changes. In this context, we try to monitor structural changes caused by the reversible oxygen binding process. Our approach is to prepare the specimens in their fully oxygenated and deoxygenated state, respectively, and to perform independent 3D reconstructions of both states. To achieve this, we developed an automated plunge-freeze apparatus capable of flash freezing the specimen in liquid ethane under controlled atmospheric conditions. Prior to fixation, the molecules are either incubated in an atmosphere with 25 % O2 + 75 % N2 (oxy-state), or in an atmosphere with 100 % N2 (deoxy-state). This led to two independent NpH datasets resulting in two 3D reconstructions with resolutions of 7.8 and 8.4 A (Figure 1), respectively. Their correlative analysis shows significant structural differences especially concerning the spatial orientation of certain FU types (Figure 2). On the basis of the two resulting molecular models it is now the task to interpret these differences in terms of allosteric interaction mechanisms, but also to reveal possible pitfalls.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85228-5_20