6533b823fe1ef96bd127f74d

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A Systematic Review of Cost-effectiveness Evidence of Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting: Is it Efficient?

S. PeiróA. García-altés

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyCost effectivenessCost-Benefit AnalysisGreater saphenous veinEfficiencyScientific evidenceVein harvestingmedicineEconomic evaluation databaseHumansSaphenous VeinEndoscopic harvestMedicine(all)business.industryGeneral surgeryHealth technologyEndoscopyEconomic evaluationSurgeryEconomic evaluationVein harvestTissue and Organ HarvestingSurgerybusinessCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineVascular Surgical Procedures

description

Objective: Greater saphenous vein harvest for coronary and lower extremity bypass requires the longest incision of any surgical procedure. Endoscopic vein harvest allows better results in some clinical variables compared to open harvesting techniques. The objec- tive of this study is to present the results of a systematic review of the scientific evidence about the efficiency of endoscopic saphenous vein harvest. Methods: We performed a systematic review in the bibliographical databases Pubmed, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and NHS Health Technology Assess- ment Database. The search strategy was "endoscopic AND harvesting", in the period January 1970eDecember 2009. Results: We identified only 3 economic evaluation studies, 2 cost analyses with some method- ological limitations, and 1 costeutility analysis. All of them suggest lower hospital costs for endoscopic harvesting. Conclusions: Available evidence does not allow recommendations to be made based on the efficiency of endoscopic saphenous vein harvest, although it suggests lower costs for endo- scopic harvesting. More scientific evidence about the long-term efficacy and the effectiveness of this technique is necessary, with studies measuring final outcomes, and carrying out complete and rigorous economic evaluations.

10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.010http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.010