6533b826fe1ef96bd1283bb0
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Comparative analysis of abundance–occupancy relationships for species at risk at both broad taxonomic and spatial scales
Jeffrey A. HutchingsJeffrey A. HutchingsJeffrey A. HutchingsAnna KuparinenNancy E. Roneysubject
0106 biological scienceseducation.field_of_studyOccupancyEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyEcology (disciplines)PopulationZoology15. Life on landBiology010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesAbundance (ecology)Spatial ecologyAnimal Science and Zoology14. Life underwaterTaxonomic rankLicheneducationSpecies at riskEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematicsdescription
The abundance–occupancy relationship is one of the most well-examined relationships in ecology. At the species level, a positive association has been widely documented. However, until recently, research on the nature of this relationship at broad taxonomic and spatial scales has been limited. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of 12 taxonomic groups across a large spatial scale (Canada), using data on Canadian species at risk: amphibians, arthropods, birds, freshwater fishes, lichens, marine fishes, marine mammals, molluscs, mosses, reptiles, terrestrial mammals, and vascular plants. We find a significantly positive relationship in all taxonomic groups with the exception of freshwater fishes (negative association) and lichens (no association). In general, our work underscores the strength and breadth of this apparently fundamental relationship and provides insight into novel applications for large-scale population dynamics. Further development of species-independent abundance–occupancy relationships, or those of a similar nature, might well prove instrumental in serving as starting points for developing species-independent reference points and recovery strategies.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-07-01 | Canadian Journal of Zoology |