6533b826fe1ef96bd128478f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy using diode laser activated indocyanine green as an adjunct in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial.
Mahvash MousaviNasim ChiniforushReza FekrazadNeda MoslemiOmid BagherpasandAdriano AzaripourZahra ChinipardazAbbas Monzavisubject
0301 basic medicineAdultIndocyanine GreenMale030103 biophysicsGingival and periodontal pocketmedicine.medical_treatmentBleeding on probingBiophysicsDentistryPhotodynamic therapyDermatologylaw.invention03 medical and health scienceschemistry.chemical_compound0302 clinical medicineScaling and root planingRandomized controlled triallawmedicineHumansPharmacology (medical)Photosensitizing Agentsbusiness.industryReproducibility of Results030206 dentistryMiddle AgedReference Standardsmedicine.diseaseChronic periodontitisOncologychemistryClinical attachment lossPhotochemotherapyChronic PeriodontitisFemalemedicine.symptomLasers SemiconductorbusinessIndocyanine greendescription
Abstract Introduction Clinical studies have shown the usefulness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunctive in periodontal therapy. These studies did not utilize indocyanine green (ICG) as a recently introduced photosensitizer. The aim of this study was to perform a full-mouth double-blind randomized controlled clinical study to test the efficacy of adjunctive aPDT with ICG compared with scaling and root planing (SRP) alone in chronic periodontitis treatment. Materials and methods Fifty patients were selected for this study. All patients received SRP. Then, each patient was randomly assigned to either the test group (aPDT + SRP) or the control group (SRP). aPDT was performed with a diode laser (wavelength: 810 nm, power: 200 mW) and ICG as photosensitizer. The adjunctive procedure was repeated after 7, 17 and 27 days. The clinical parameters including bleeding on probing (BOP), clinical attachment loss (CAL), plaque index (PI), probing pocket depth (PPD), full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months. Results There were no significant differences between two groups at baseline. BOP, PPD and FMBS showed significant improvements in the test group (P ≤ 0.001). In terms of PI, FMPS and CAL, no significant differences were observed between both groups (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion aPDT as an adjunctive approach yielded complete resolution of inflammation and significant reduction in periodontal pocket depth. However, aPDT had no additional advantages in clinical attachment gain and plaque score.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-06-01 | Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy |