6533b826fe1ef96bd128513f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Changes in Muscle Activity Patterns and Joint Kinematics During Gait in Hemophilic Arthropathy

Carlos Cruz-montecinosCarlos Cruz-montecinosCarlos Cruz-montecinosSofía Pérez-alendaFelipe QuerolMauricio CerdaMauricio CerdaHuub Maas

subject

joint damageelectromyographyPhysiologyVastus medialisElectromyography030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyKnee JointBicepslcsh:Physiologyknee joint03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinePhysiology (medical)medicineankle jointlower limb kinematicsOriginal Researchmedicine.diagnostic_testlcsh:QP1-981business.industryAnatomymusculoskeletal systemGaithemophilic arthropathymedicine.anatomical_structureGait analysisgait analysisAnkleRange of motionbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Hemophilic arthropathy is the result of repetitive intra-articular bleeding and synovial inflammation. In people with hemophilic arthropathy (PWHA), very little is known about the neural control of individual muscles during movement. The aim of the present study was to assess if the neural control of individual muscles and coordination between antagonistic muscle pairs and joint kinematics during gait are affected in PWHA. Thirteen control subjects (CG) walked overground at their preferred and slow velocity (1 m/s), and 14 PWHA walked overground at the preferred velocity (1 m/s). Joint kinematics and temporal gait parameters were assessed using four inertial sensors. Surface electromyography (EMG) was collected from gluteus maximus (GMAX), gluteus medius (GMED), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), medial gastrocnemius (MG), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), soleus (SOL), tibialis anterior (TA), semitendinosus (ST), and biceps femoris (BF). Waveforms were compared using the time-series analysis through statistical parametric mapping. In PWHA compared to CG, EMG amplitude during the stance phase was higher for LG (for both velocities of the CG), BF (slow velocity only), and ST (preferred velocity only) (p < 0.05). Co-contraction during the stance phase was higher for MG-TA, LG-TA, VL-BF, VM-ST, LG-VL, and MG-VM (both velocities) (p < 0.05). MG and LG were excited earlier (preferred velocity only) (p < 0.05). A later offset during the stance phase was found for VL, BF, and ST (both velocities), and BF and GMAX (preferred velocity only) (p < 0.05). In addition, the range of motion in knee and ankle joints was lower in PWHA (both velocities) and hip joint (preferred velocity only) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the neural control of individual muscles and coordination between antagonistic muscles during gait in PWHA differs substantially from control subjects.

10.3389/fphys.2019.01575https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01575/full