6533b827fe1ef96bd1285ba8
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
Thomas Metzingersubject
Phenomenology (philosophy)03 medical and health sciencesPolitics0302 clinical medicineArgumentPhilosophy05 social sciences0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesConstructive030217 neurology & neurosurgery050105 experimental psychologyEpistemologydescription
This paper has a critical and a constructive part. The first part formulates a political demand, based on ethical considerations: Until 2050, there should be a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology, strictly banning all research that directly aims at or knowingly risks the emergence of artificial consciousness on post-biotic carrier systems. The second part lays the first conceptual foundations for an open-ended process with the aim of gradually refining the original moratorium, tying it to an ever more fine-grained, rational, evidence-based, and hopefully ethically convincing set of constraints. The systematic research program defined by this process could lead to an incremental reformulation of the original moratorium. It might result in a moratorium repeal even before 2050, in the continuation of a strict ban beyond the year 2050, or a gradually evolving, more substantial, and ethically refined view of which — if any — kinds of conscious experience we want to implement in AI systems.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-02-19 | Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness |