6533b827fe1ef96bd1285c91

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Peri-implant peripheral giant cell lesions : report of 13 new cases and comparative histological and immunohistochemical analysis with peripheral and central giant cell lesions

Oslei Paes De AlmeidaThayná Melo De Lima MoraisJosé Manuel Aguirre UrizarJavier Alberdi-navarroCiro Dantas SoaresFábio Ramôa Pires

subject

AdultPathologymedicine.medical_specialtyProliferative indexCD34Giant CellsPeripheral blood mononuclear cell03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineOsteoprotegerinGranuloma Giant CellmedicineHumansGeneral DentistryOral Medicine and Pathologybusiness.industryCD68Research030206 dentistrymedicine.disease:CIENCIAS MÉDICAS [UNESCO]OtorhinolaryngologyGiant cellGranulomaUNESCO::CIENCIAS MÉDICASImmunohistochemistryFemaleSurgerybusiness

description

Background Few cases or peri-implant peripheral giant cell lesions (PGCL) have been reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to report 13 new cases of peri-implant PGCL and compare the expression of smooth muscle actin, Bcl-2 protein, GLUT-1, CD68, osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B, Ki-67 and CD34 in these cases with PGCL and central giant cell lesions (CGCL). Material and Methods Clinical data were retrieved from the laboratory records and histological analysis was performed using HE-stained slides. Immunohistochemical reactions for the above mentioned antibodies were performed and digitally scored. Results Peri-implant PGCL mostly affected the posterior mandible of adult females. CD68 and Bcl-2 expressions were higher in conventional PGCL and CGCL than in peri-implant PGCL (p=0.033 for CD68 and p<.0001 for Bcl-2). Microvessel density was higher in conventional peripheral than in central and peri-implant PGCL (p=0.002). Proliferative index of the mononuclear cells showed no statistically significant differences comparing the three groups but it was higher in peri-implant PGCL. Conclusions The current study demonstrated that peri-implant PGCL is more common in the posterior mandible of adult females. There were some differences in microvessel density, proliferative activity and expression of CD68 and Bcl-2 among conventional PGCL, peri-implant and CGCL. Further studies are encouraged to better understand these early findings. Key words:Giant cell lesion, giant cell granuloma, peripheral, dental implants, immunohistochemistry.

https://hdl.handle.net/10550/72932