6533b828fe1ef96bd1287aef

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Associations of physical activity, fitness, and body composition with heart rate variability–based indicators of stress and recovery on workdays: a cross-sectional study

Marjukka KolehmainenJaakko KaprioSara MutikainenTiina TeisalaUrho M. KujalaMirva RottensteinerHeikki RuskoAsko TolvanenTuija Leskinen

subject

medicine.medical_specialtyWorking hoursCross-sectional studyPSYCHOSOCIAL STRESSHRVPhysical activityphysical activityRATE DYNAMICSEXERCISEBurnoutToxicologyBody compositionBody fat percentagerecoveryBMIRecoveryInternal medicinemedicineHeart rate variabilityBody fat percentageCardiorespiratory fitnesskehonkoostumusWork stress2. Zero hungercardiorespiratory fitnessPhysical activitybusiness.industryResearchPublic Health Environmental and Occupational HealthFAT DISTRIBUTIONMENCardiorespiratory fitnesswork stressAnthropometrybody fat percentage3142 Public health care science environmental and occupational healthtyöaikaRISK-FACTORSBURNOUTPhysical therapyWEIGHTbusinessOBESE WOMENSafety ResearchBody mass indexAUTONOMIC ACTIVITY

description

Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate how physical activity (PA), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and body composition are associated with heart rate variability (HRV)-based indicators of stress and recovery on workdays. Additionally, we evaluated the association of objectively measured stress with self-reported burnout symptoms. Methods. Participants of this cross-sectional study were 81 healthy males (age range 26–40 y). Stress and recovery on workdays were measured objectively based on HRV recordings. CRF and anthropometry were assessed in laboratory conditions. The level of PA was based on a detailed PA interview (MET index [MET-h/d]) and self-reported activity class. Results. PA, CRF, and body composition were significantly associated with levels of stress and recovery on workdays. MET index (P < 0.001), activity class (P = 0.001), and CRF (P = 0.019) were negatively associated with stress during working hours whereas body fat percentage (P = 0.005) was positively associated. Overall, 27.5% of the variance of total stress on workdays (P = 0.001) was accounted for by PA, CRF, and body composition. Body fat percentage and body mass index were negatively associated with night-time recovery whereas CRF was positively associated. Objective work stress was associated (P = 0.003) with subjective burnout symptoms. Conclusions. PA, CRF, and body composition are associated with HRV-based stress and recovery levels, which needs to be taken into account in the measurement, prevention, and treatment of work-related stress. The HRV-based method used to determine work-related stress and recovery was associated with self-reported burnout symptoms, but more research on the clinical importance of the methodology is needed. peerReviewed

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-9-16