6533b829fe1ef96bd12896df

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Spectroscopic studies of the(4)1Σ+state of RbCs and modeling of the optical cycle for ultracoldX 1Σ+(v=0,J=0)molecule production

subject

description

We performed high-resolution Fourier-transform spectroscopy measurements and direct-potential-fit of the shelflike RbCs $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ state. Overall, 2317 rovibronic ${v}^{\ensuremath{'}},{J}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ term values with ${v}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\in}[3,88]$, ${J}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\in}[7,276]$ were obtained with accuracy 0.01 cm${}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ from the $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+},a{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) spectra. The mass-invariant potential energy curve constructed by means of the Chebyshev polynomial expansion reproduced the experimental term values of both ${}^{85}$Rb${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{133}$Cs and ${}^{87}$Rb${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{133}$Cs isotopologues with a standard deviation of 0.005 cm${}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. We simulated the optical cycle $X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+},a{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}({v}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}},{J}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}=0)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}({v}^{\ensuremath{'}},{J}^{\ensuremath{'}}=1)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}({v}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}=0,{J}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}}=0)$ appropriate to transfer translationally ultracold RbCs molecules into their absolute ground state from the weakly bound rovibronic levels of both singlet $X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ and triplet $a{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ ground states. The optimal transfer via the intermediate $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ state with ${v}^{\ensuremath{'}}=58,60$, and 61 for ${}^{85}$Rb${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{133}$Cs as well as ${v}^{\ensuremath{'}}=59$ and 61 for ${}^{87}$Rb${\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{133}$Cs was predicted. The required spin-allowed $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}\ensuremath{-}X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ and spin-forbidden $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}\ensuremath{-}a{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ dipole transition moments were obtained within the framework of ab initio quasirelativistic calculations. The predicted $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+},a{\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{3}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}$ transition probabilities were consistent with the experimental relative intensity distributions for several $(4){\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}}^{1}{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}^{+}({v}^{\ensuremath{'}})\ensuremath{\rightarrow}X,a({v}^{\ensuremath{'}\ensuremath{'}})$ LIF progressions.