6533b829fe1ef96bd12897d1

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Spectroscopy of Kr70 and isospin symmetry in the T=1 fpg shell nuclei

E. SahinH. BadranJari PartanenJanne PakarinenW. KortenD. M. DebenhamC. ScholeyMatti LeinoJoonas KonkiPanu RuotsalainenPanu RuotsalainenA.d HerzaáňP. J. DaviesD. G. JenkinsRauno JulinPhilippos PapadakisJack HendersonJack HendersonGavin LotayS. JuutinenT.a HaylettP. PeuraKalle AuranenP.d GreenleesUlrika JakobssonJuha SorriL. SinclairMikael SandzeliusP. JoshiM MallaburnH. M. DavidH. M. DavidSanna StolzeG. De AngelisK.c KanekoR. WadsworthTuomas GrahnJuha UusitaloPanu RahkilaJan SarénM. A. Bentley

subject

Physics010308 nuclear & particles physicsShell (structure)Space (mathematics)01 natural sciencesSymmetry (physics)Nuclear physicsmedicine.anatomical_structureIsospin0103 physical sciencesIsobarmedicineAtomic physics010306 general physicsSpin (physics)SpectroscopyNucleus

description

The recoil-β tagging technique has been used in conjunction with the 40 Ca(32 S ,2n) reaction at a beam energy of 88 MeV to identify transitions associated with the decay of the 2 + and, tentatively, 4 + states in the nucleus 70 Kr. These data are used, along with previously published data, to examine the triplet energy differences (TED) for the mass 70 isobars. The experimental TED values are compared with shell model calculations, performed with the JUN45 interaction in the fpg model space, that include a J = 0 isospin nonconserving (INC) interaction with an isotensor strength of 100 keV. The agreement is found to be very good up to spin 4 and supports the expectation for analog states that all three nuclei have the same oblate shape at low-spin. The A = 70 results are compared with the experimental and shell model predicted TED and mirror energy differences (MED) for the mass 66 and 74 systems. The comparisons clearly demonstrate the importance of the isotensor INC interaction in replicating the TED data in this region. Issues related to the observed MED values and their interpretation within the shell model are discussed.

https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.94.054311