6533b829fe1ef96bd128af00

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Adjuvant volumetric-modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in endometrial cancer. Planning and toxicity comparison

Angelo PiermatteiFrancesco DeodatoGabriella FerrandinaAlessio G. MorgantiValentiniSavino CillaFrancesco LeggeGiovanni ScambiaChianteraGabriella Macchia

subject

Simultaneous integrated boostAdultOrgans at RiskRadiology Nuclear Medicine and Imagingmedicine.medical_treatmentRectumvolumetric-modulated arc therapyMedicineHumansAgedAged 80 and overbusiness.industryEndometrial cancerRadiotherapy Planning Computer-AssistedtoxicityRadiotherapy DosageGeneral MedicineHematologyMiddle Agedmedicine.diseaseVolumetric modulated arc therapyAcute toxicityEndometrial Neoplasmsmedicine.anatomical_structureOncologysimultaneous integrated boostToxicityendometrial cancerVaginal vaultFemaleRadiotherapy Intensity-ModulatedbusinessNuclear medicineAdjuvant

description

Objective. To report dosimetric and acute toxicity data in prospectively enrolled high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer (HIR-EC) patients postoperatively irradiated by simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT). Methods. Thirty prospectively enrolled HIR-EC patients were postoperatively treated by SIB-VMAT. Target coverage, dose homogeneity, and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared with corresponding data retrieved from an historical control (30 consecutive selected matched patients) treated by concomitant boost three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT CB) from a previously published study (ADA-I trial). All patients received 45 Gy on pelvic lymph nodes plus 10 Gy boost on the vaginal vault. Results. The SIB-VMAT technique produced more inhomogeneous plans than 3D CRT CB, but showed significantly better conformity index (CIs) for both PTVs. SIB-VMAT was associated with significant reduction in the irradiated small bowel (SB) volume compared with 3D CRT CB for all dose range > 10 Gy (e.g. V15: 163.5 cm3 vs. 341.3 cm3, p = 0.001 and V40: 43.8 cm3 vs. 85.2 cm3, p = 0.008). With regard to bladder and rectum, SIB-VMAT showed a significant sparing advantage at all dose levels with respect to 3D CRT CB retrieved plans. Moreover, overall OARs Dmean were significantly reduced by the SIB-VMAT (p = 0.001). According to CTCAE v.4.0, acute (within three months) GI toxicities were more frequent in 3D CRT CB versus SIB-VMAT (90.0% vs. 66.7%; p-value 0.028). Conclusions. Compared to data from a historical database of patients administered 3D CRT CB, SIB-VMAT significantly improves the dose conformity and sparing of OARs in HIR-EC patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. The improvement in terms of acute toxicity justifies further prospective clinical evaluation.

https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1623058.v1