6533b82afe1ef96bd128b95e

RESEARCH PRODUCT

5th generation vs 4th generation troponin T in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for non-cardiac indications: A cohort study.

Joshua EasonTalal S AlnabelsiSethabhisha NerusuKaram AyoubAndrew ParksJohn KotterAndin MullisChen DaiVedant GuptaSteve W. LeungMarc ParanzinoDaniel ClelandLevi MayVincent L. Sorrell

subject

MaleCritical Care and Emergency MedicineEpidemiologyMyocardial InfarctionCardiovascular Medicine030204 cardiovascular system & hematologyBiochemistryElectrocardiographyMedical Conditions0302 clinical medicineMedicine and Health Sciences030212 general & internal medicineMyocardial infarctionImmunoassayMultidisciplinarymedicine.diagnostic_testbiologyTroponin TQRMiddle Agedmusculoskeletal systemTroponinHospitalizationBioassays and Physiological AnalysisCardiovascular DiseasesCohortCardiologyMedicineFemaleResearch ArticleCohort studymedicine.medical_specialtyDeath RatesScienceCardiologyResearch and Analysis Methods03 medical and health sciencesTroponin TPopulation MetricsPredictive Value of TestsInternal medicinemedicineHumansMortalityPopulation Biologybusiness.industryElectrophysiological TechniquesBiology and Life SciencesProteinsEmergency departmentCardiovascular Disease Riskmedicine.diseaseTroponinCytoskeletal ProteinsMedical Risk Factorsbiology.proteinCardiac ElectrophysiologybusinessElectrocardiographyMace

description

Objective The frequency and implications of an elevated cardiac troponin (4th or 5th generation TnT) in patients outside of the emergency department or presenting with non-cardiac conditions is unclear. Methods Consecutive patients aged 18 years or older admitted for a primary non-cardiac condition who had the 4th generation TnT drawn had the 5th generation TnT run on the residual blood sample. Primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) respectively at 1 year. Results 918 patients were included (mean age 59.8 years, 55% male) in the cohort. 69% had elevated 5th generation TnT while 46% had elevated 4th generation TnT. 5th generation TnT was more sensitive and less specific than 4th generation TnT in predicting both ACM and MACE. The sensitivities for the 5th generation TnT assay were 85% for ACM and 90% for MACE rates, compared to 65% and 70% respectively for the 4th generation assay. 5th generation TnT positive patients that were missed by 4th generation TnT had a higher risk of ACM (27.5%) than patients with both assays negative (27.5% vs 11.1%, p<0.001), but lower than patients who had both assay positive (42.1%). MACE rates were not better stratified using the 5th generation TnT assay. Conclusions In patients admitted for a non-cardiac condition, 5th generation TnT is more sensitive although less specific in predicting MACE and ACM. 5th generation TnT identifies an intermediate risk group for ACM previously missed with the 4th generation assay.

10.1371/journal.pone.0246332https://doaj.org/article/4a2d89703cf94730b13b1787b5c07334