6533b82bfe1ef96bd128e0d9

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Quality management in higher education: A comparative study of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland

Laurie LomasChristine TeelkenJani UrsinC.s. NairL. WebsterP. Mertova

subject

Medical educationDisappointmentQuality managementHigher educationbusiness.industrymedia_common.quotation_subjectControl (management)Quality enhancementSchedule (workplace)Pedagogymedicinemedicine.symptombusinessQuality assuranceAutonomymedia_common

description

This chapter examines lecturers’ perceptions of the balance between quality assurance and quality enhancement in three case study higher education institutions in different European countries. Where quality initiatives emphasised assurance rather than enhancement, this was taken to indicate a significant limitation on a lecturer’s autonomy in the quality management process. In-depth interviews using a semi-structured schedule were conducted with 20 randomly selected academic staff in each of the three higher education institutions. The results from the interviews demonstrated a very wide range of views among the interviewees. However, generally, it was found that there was a high level of disappointment with only limited transformation of teaching and learning through quality enhancement. This sense of disappointment was particularly acute in the UK and Dutch institutions where many interviewees expressed concern that quality assurance approaches tended to dominate. In the Finnish higher education institutions, there was a more positive attitude towards quality initiatives with a far higher proportion of interviewees considering that lecturers had significant control over the quality management process and they felt that there was an appropriate balance of quality assurance and quality enhancement.

10.1016/b978-1-84334-576-3.50005-4https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-576-3.50005-4