6533b82cfe1ef96bd128f48a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

3-Dimensional Analysis and Systematic Review of Root Canal Morphology and Physiological Foramen Geometry of 109 Mandibular First Premolars by Micro-computed Tomography in a Mixed Swiss-German Population.

Benjamín Briseño-marroquínThomas Gerhard WolfThomas Gerhard WolfPaul KimGuglielmo CampusMark SiegristMichael Stiebritz

subject

0301 basic medicineRoot canalPopulationMandible03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinemedicineForamenBicuspidTooth RooteducationGeneral DentistryOrthodonticseducation.field_of_studySystem codebusiness.industryMicro computed tomography030206 dentistryRoot canal morphologyMandibular first premolarX-Ray Microtomography030104 developmental biologymedicine.anatomical_structureCross-Sectional StudiesWide diameterDental Pulp CavitybusinessSwitzerland

description

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to systematically revise the root canal configuration (RCC) literature and to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars (Ma1Ps) of 2 populations by means of micro–computed tomographic imaging. Methods This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines including RCC randomized controlled trials and cross-sectional, cohort, comparative, validation, and evaluation studies. Furthermore, the RCC, physiological foramina, the frequency of accessory and connecting canals, and the physiological foramina morphology of 109 Ma1Ps were investigated by means of micro–computed tomographic imaging. The RCC results are described using a 4-digit system code. Results The most frequent RCCs observed were 1-1-1/1 (70.6%), 1-1-2/2 (7.3%), 1-2-2/2 (7.3%), and 1-2-1/1 (5.5%). Accessory canals were observed in 31.2%. Connecting canals were observed in 1-1-2/2 (4.6%), 1-2-2/2 (4.6%), 1-1-2/1 (1.8%), and 1-2-1/1 (1.8%) RCCs. Accessory foramina were observed in 52.3%; 30.3% of the Ma1Ps had 1 accessory foramen, 12.8% had 2, 2.8% had 3, 2.8% had 4, 2.8% had 5, and 0.92% had 6. The narrow and wide diameter mean of 136 physiological foramina was 0.28 mm (±0.9) and 0.37 mm (±0.11) when only 1 physiological foramen was present. Conclusions This study provides detailed root canal morphology of Ma1Ps in a Swiss-German population. Within the limitations of the study, the authors recommend a final physiological foramen preparation size of instrument tip sizes 30–40; yet, such a decision should be carefully considered on an individual basis.

10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.002https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32303349