6533b82dfe1ef96bd1290983
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Absolok® versus Hem-o-Lok® clips for renorrhaphy during partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumors
Gianluca GiannariniMattia CalandrielloMarta RossaneseSimonato AlchiedeGiuseppe AlarioAlessandro CrestaniVincenzo Ficarrasubject
MaleComplicationsmedicine.medical_treatment030232 urology & nephrologyKidneyNephrectomyPolydioxanonechemistry.chemical_compoundPostoperative Complications0302 clinical medicinePerioperative outcomesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSuture (anatomy)bsolok® clipPartial nephrectomyMedicineProspective StudiesCLIPSIntraoperative ComplicationsProspective cohort studycomputer.programming_languageMiddle AgedSurgical InstrumentsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRenal cell carcinomaKidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyTreatment Outcomesurgical procedures operativeNephrologyPolydioxanone030220 oncology & carcinogenesiscardiovascular systemFemalePositive Surgical MarginAbsolok (R) clips Hem-o-lok (R) clips Renorrhaphy Sliding clip technique Partial nephrectomy Perioperative outcomes Complications Renal cell carcinomaPerioperative outcomeHem-o-Lok® clipmedicine.medical_specialtyKidney CortexUrologyeducationSliding clip technique03 medical and health sciencesHumansRenorrhaphycardiovascular diseasesAgedHemostasisAbsolok (R) clipsSuturesbusiness.industryPerioperativeSurgeryHem-o-lok (R) clipschemistryHemostasisTomography X-Ray ComputedbusinessComplicationcomputerdescription
Background To compare perioperative and functional outcomes associated with renorrhaphy performed with two different types of clips (Absolok® vs. Hem-o-Lok®) in a contemporary series of patients who underwent partial nephrectomy. Methods Patients in whom Absolok® clips were used to perform haemostasis at the level of tumor bed or to block the running sutures during sliding-clip renorrhaphy (study group) were compared with a contemporary control group of patients in whom renorrhaphy was performed with Hem-o-Lok® clips. Both groups received the same surgical technique via an open or robot-assisted approach. Inner renorrhaphy was performed with one or more 3-0 (26 mm needle) monofilament running suture(s) preloaded with medium Absolok® clips in the study group, and with medium Hem-o-Lok® clips in the control group. Cortical renorrhaphy was performed using interrupted 2-0 (26 mm needle) polyfilament sutures placed at intervals of 1 cm using the sliding-clip technique with Absolok® clips in the study group and with Hem-o-Lok® clips in the control group. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. Results Absolok® clips were used in 57 patients, while Hem-o-Lok® clips were used in 40 patients. The two groups were comparable for all preoperative patient and tumor characteristics. No differences were observed in terms of operating room time (P=0.29), off-clamp technique rate (P=0.96), warm ischemia time (P=0.19) and estimated blood loss (P=0.18). No difference in the rate of positive surgical margins was detected (P=0.21). Ninety-day complications were observed in 32 (33%) cases. No difference in overall and major postoperative complications were observed between the two groups (P=0.20). Abdominal CT scan performed after 3 months following surgery showed no Absolok® clips in all cases. Conclusions Absolok® clips are a valid alternative to Hem-o-Lok® clips to secure blood vessels at the level of tumor bed and to perform a sliding-clip renorrhaphy in patients who underwent open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 | Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica |