6533b82dfe1ef96bd1290b1f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Nonsurgical Procedures for Keratoconus Management

María García-monteroLaura Rico-del-viejoAmalia Lorente-velázquezFernando Gómez-sanzSantiago García-lázaroJosé Luis Hernández-verdejo

subject

Keratoconusgenetic structuresPopulationLentes de contactoContext (language use)Review Articlelaw.invention03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinelcsh:OphthalmologylawmedicineOptometríaIn patienteducationeducation.field_of_studyModalitiesbusiness.industrySurgical proceduresmedicine.diseaseeye diseasesContact lensLens (optics)Ophthalmologylcsh:RE1-994030221 ophthalmology & optometryOptometryOftalmologíaÓptica oftálmicasense organsbusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgery

description

Objectives. To describe the past 20 years’ correction modalities for keratoconus and their visual outcomes and possible complications.Methods. A review of the published literature related to the visual outcomes and possible complications in the context of keratoconus management using nonsurgical procedures for the last 20 years (glasses and contact lenses) was performed. Original articles that reported the outcome of any correction modalities of keratoconus management were reviewed.Results. The most nonsurgical procedure used on keratoconus management is the contact lens fitting. Soft contact lenses and soft toric contact lenses, rigid gas-permeable contact lenses, piggyback contact lens system, hybrid contact lenses, and scleral and corneoscleral contact lenses form the contemporary range of available lens types for keratoconus management with contact lenses. All of them try to restore the vision, improve the quality of life, and delay surgical procedures in patients with this disease. Complications are derived from the intolerance of using contact lens, and the use of each depends on keratoconus severity.Conclusions. In the context of nonsurgical procedures, the use of contact lenses for the management of keratoconic patients represents a good alternative to restore vision and improve the quality of live in this population.

10.1155/2017/9707650http://eprints.ucm.es/46114/