6533b82dfe1ef96bd129149f

RESEARCH PRODUCT

A comparative economic analysis of torrefied pellet production based on state-of-the-art pellets

David A. AgarDavid A. Agar

subject

Capital investment020209 energyPellets02 engineering and technology010501 environmental sciencestorrefied pellets01 natural sciencesPellet0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineeringEconomic analysisProduction (economics)biocoalWaste Management and Disposalta215ta2180105 earth and related environmental sciencesRenewable Energy Sustainability and the Environmentwood pelletsdigestive oral and skin physiologyForestryeconomicsPulp and paper industryTorrefactionpelletsSustainable energytorrefactionEnvironmental scienceHeat of combustionAgronomy and Crop Science

description

Abstract Torrefied pellets have fuel properties superior to those of conventional wood pellets and potentially allow greater rates of co-firing and thus larger reductions in net CO 2 emissions. Despite the growing amount of scientific output on torrefaction, the economic feasibility of torrefied pellet production is still a topic of considerable uncertainty. This is an obstacle for decision makers looking to implement sustainable energy policies. This paper compares the economics of torrefied pellets to conventional wood pellets. Working backwards from demonstrated pellet properties, this work attempts to answer the following question: Based on state-of-the-art torrefied pellets, what would be the maximum capital investment required for a torrefied pellet plant so that production is economically viable? Herein, the production costs of torrefied pellets are calculated based on inputs in production. The market value of the produced pellets is estimated and a cash-flow analysis is carried out. Three economic indicators are calculated and compared for a torrefied and conventional pellet production scenario. A sensitivity analysis is carried out for selected process inputs and the cost of CO 2 through co-firing pellets is estimated. The results indicate that state-of-the-art torrefied pellet production cannot compete with conventional pellets even with transatlantic product transport distances. A high capital investment cost and a low heating value are the main barriers to economic feasibility of state-of-the-art torrefied pellets.

10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.019https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.12.019