6533b82dfe1ef96bd1291f5f
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Dog behaviour classification with movement sensors placed on the harness and the collar
Sanni SomppiMiiamaaria V. KujalaMiiamaaria V. KujalaHeli VäätäjäHeini TörnqvistAntti VehkaojaChristoph Hoog AntinkYulia GizatdinovaAnna Valldeoriola CardóVeikko SurakkaOuti VainioPäivi MajarantaPekka Kumpulainensubject
dogsaktiivisuusComputer scienceWearable computerAccelerometer413 Veterinary science01 natural sciencesCollarlaw.inventionCanine0403 veterinary scienceFood AnimalsSniffinglawAccelerometryDogälyvaatteetComputer vision412 Animal science dairy science318 Medical biotechnologyMovement (music)Wearable technologyGyroscope04 agricultural and veterinary sciencesliikkeentunnistuskoneoppiminenbehaviour classificationActivity monitoringeläimeteläinten koulutusactivity monitoringBehaviour classification040301 veterinary sciencesaktigrafiacanineSittingkoiraeläinten käyttäytyminenwearable technologyACCELEROMETERClassifier (linguistics)MEASURED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITYaccelerometrypuettava teknologiaVALIDITYkäyttäytyminenbusiness.industry010401 analytical chemistryANIMALS113 Computer and information sciencesActigraphy0104 chemical sciencesACCELERATION DATAkoulutusmittarit (mittaus)Animal Science and ZoologyArtificial intelligencebusinessactigraphydescription
Dog owners’ understanding of the daily behaviour of their dogs may be enhanced by movement measurements that can detect repeatable dog behaviour, such as levels of daily activity and rest as well as their changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of supervised machine learning methods utilising accelerometer and gyroscope data provided by wearable movement sensors in classification of seven typical dog activities in a semi-controlled test situation. Forty-five middle to large sized dogs participated in the study. Two sensor devices were attached to each dog, one on the back of the dog in a harness and one on the neck collar. Altogether 54 features were extracted from the acceleration and gyroscope signals divided in two-second segments. The performance of four classifiers were compared using features derived from both sensor modalities. and from the acceleration data only. The results were promising; the movement sensor at the back yielded up to 91 % accuracy in classifying the dog activities and the sensor placed at the collar yielded 75 % accuracy at best. Including the gyroscope features improved the classification accuracy by 0.7–2.6 %, depending on the classifier and the sensor location. The most distinct activity was sniffing, whereas the static postures (lying on chest, sitting and standing) were the most challenging behaviours to classify, especially from the data of the neck collar sensor. The data used in this article as well as the signal processing scripts are openly available in Mendeley Data, https://doi.org/10.17632/vxhx934tbn.1. publishedVersion Peer reviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2021-08-01 |