6533b82efe1ef96bd129263a

RESEARCH PRODUCT

Megaphylogenetic Specimen-level Approaches to the <I>Carex</I> (Cyperaceae) Phylogeny Using ITS, ETS, and <I>matK</I> Sequences: Implications for Classification

Sebastian GebauerSantiago Martín-bravoShuren ZhangJocelyn E. PenderMónica MíguezXiao Feng JinJulian R. StarrPedro Jiménez-mejíasBrianna N. ChouinardMarcia J. WaterwaySangtae KimEric H. RoalsonKyong Sook ChungTamara VillaverdeRobert F. C. NacziKate LuedersModesto LuceñoKaren L. WilsonBerit GehrkeMatthias H. HoffmannBruce A. FordAna MolinaJong Cheol YangJongduk JungEnrique MaguillaKerry A. FordAnton A. ReznicekMarlene HahnBethany H. BrownAndrew L. HippMarcial Escudero

subject

0106 biological sciencesParaphylyCarexbiologyPhylogenetic treePlant Sciencebiology.organism_classification010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesPhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyPolyphylyBotanyGeneticsSupermatrixTaxonomy (biology)CladeEcology Evolution Behavior and Systematics010606 plant biology & botany

description

Abstract We present the first large-scale phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus Carex based on 996 of the 1983 accepted species (50.23%). We used a supermatrix approach using three DNA regions: ETS, ITS and matK. Every concatenated sequence was derived from a single specimen. The topology of our phylogenetic reconstruction largely agreed with previous studies. We also gained new insights into the early divergence structure of the two largest clades, core Carex and Vignea clades, challenging some previous evolutionary hypotheses about inflorescence structure. Most sections were recovered as non-monophyletic. Homoplasy of characters traditionally selected as relevant for classification, historical misunderstanding of how morphology varies across Carex, and regional rather than global views of Carex diversity seem to be the main reasons for the high levels of polyphyly and paraphyly in the current infrageneric classification.

https://doi.org/10.1600/036364416x692497