6533b82efe1ef96bd1293437
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Evolutionary conservation advice for despotic populations: habitat heterogeneity favours conflict and reduces productivity in Seychelles magpie robins
Ken NorrisHanna KokkoHanna KokkoAndrés López‐sepulcreAndrés López-sepulcreAndrés López-sepulcresubject
0106 biological sciencesMaleConservation of Natural Resourcesmedia_common.quotation_subjectPopulationEndangered speciesBiologySeychelles010603 evolutionary biology01 natural sciencesGeneral Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular BiologyCompetition (biology)AnimalsPasseriformeseducationProductivityResearch ArticlesEcosystemGeneral Environmental Sciencemedia_commoneducation.field_of_studyIdeal free distributionGeneral Immunology and MicrobiologyBehavior AnimalEcology010604 marine biology & hydrobiologyReproductionHabitat conservationGeneral Medicine15. Life on landBiological EvolutionSpatial heterogeneitySocial DominanceBiological dispersalFemaleGeneral Agricultural and Biological SciencesTerritorialitydescription
Individual preferences for good habitat are often thought to have a beneficial stabilizing effect for populations. However, if individuals preferentially compete for better-quality territories, these may become hotspots of conflict. We show that, in an endangered species, this process decreases the productivity of favoured territories to the extent that differences in productivity between territories disappear. Unlike predictions from current demographic theory on site-dependent population regulation (ideal despotic distribution), we show that population productivity is reduced if resources are distributed unevenly in space. Competition for high-quality habitat can thus have detrimental consequences for populations even though it benefits individuals. Manipulating conflict (e.g. by reducing variation in habitat quality) can therefore prove an effective conservation measure in species with strong social or territorial conflict.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010-06-09 |