6533b82efe1ef96bd1293dc2
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Know your full potential: Quantitative Kelvin probe force microscopy on nanoscale electrical devices
Niklas TausendpfundIlka M. HermesStefan A. L. WeberAmelie AxtVictor W. Bergmannsubject
FM-KPFMMaterials scienceNanostructureGeneral Physics and Astronomy02 engineering and technologylcsh:Chemical technology01 natural sciencesAM-KPFMlcsh:TechnologyFull Research Paperlaw.inventioncrosstalkfield effect transistorlawElectric field0103 physical sciencesMicroscopySolar cellNanotechnologyfrequency modulation sidebandGeneral Materials Sciencelcsh:TP1-1185Electrical and Electronic Engineeringlcsh:Sciencequantitative Kelvin probe force microscopy010302 applied physicsKelvin probe force microscopecross sectionbusiness.industrylcsh:Tfrequency modulation heterodyne021001 nanoscience & nanotechnologyAM off resonanceAM lift modelcsh:QC1-999NanoscienceAM second eigenmodesolar cellsOptoelectronicsField-effect transistorlcsh:Q0210 nano-technologybusinessFrequency modulationlcsh:PhysicsVoltagedescription
In this study we investigate the influence of the operation method in Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) on the measured potential distribution. KPFM is widely used to map the nanoscale potential distribution in operating devices, e.g., in thin film transistors or on cross sections of functional solar cells. Quantitative surface potential measurements are crucial for understanding the operation principles of functional nanostructures in these electronic devices. Nevertheless, KPFM is prone to certain imaging artifacts, such as crosstalk from topography or stray electric fields. Here, we compare different amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM) KPFM methods on a reference structure consisting of an interdigitated electrode array. This structure mimics the sample geometry in device measurements, e.g., on thin film transistors or on solar cell cross sections. In particular, we investigate how quantitative different KPFM methods can measure a predefined externally applied voltage difference between the electrodes. We found that generally, FM-KPFM methods provide more quantitative results that are less affected by the presence of stray electric fields compared to AM-KPFM methods.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018-06-01 | Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology |