6533b82ffe1ef96bd1294823
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Oral chemotherapy and patient perspective in solid tumors: a national survey by the Italian association of medical oncology.
Gianluigi LunardiGianfranco FilippelliStefania GoriFotios LoupakisFrancesca CoatiAntonio RossiElena CollovàLibero CiuffredaA. L. GentileGaetano AurilioValter TorriVittorio GebbiaFrancesco AtzoriGabriele LuppiStefania RedanaPlacido AmadioGiuseppe Luigi BannaIlaria MarconGiancarlo PruneriLaura OrlandoFrancesca Di FabioLucia Del MastroFranco NolèNicla La Verdesubject
OncologyAdultMaleCancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialtyOral chemotherapyAdministration OralWork commitment03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineInternal medicineNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsmedicineHumansImpact on family030212 general & internal medicineInfusions IntravenousOral therapyAgedbusiness.industryIntravenous chemotherapyGeneral MedicineMiddle AgedPatient perceptionsOncologyItaly030220 oncology & carcinogenesisQuality of LifeCombined therapyFemalebusinessdescription
Aim To assess patient perception toward oral chemotherapy for solid tumors, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology performed a large multi-institutional national survey. Methods A 17-item anonymous questionnaire including 7 general and 10 investigational questions with free-text, single-choice, or multiple-choice answers was administered. Analysis of response distribution according to predefined factors was described by summary measures and conducted by χ2 test and other nonparametric tests. Results From January to June 2010, 581 patients completed the questionnaire; data of 404 patients constituted the final study sample. Three groups could be distinguished according to treatment: IV chemotherapy (IV group, n = 313), oral chemotherapy (oral group, n = 48), or combined therapy (combined group, n = 43). Thirty-one (72%) patients in the combined group and 187 (60%) in the IV group expressed preference for oral therapy (p = 0.028). Limitations in family and work commitment were more frequently perceived by patients on IV than oral chemotherapy (147 (47%) vs 14 (29%) patients, p<0.05, and 134 (43%) vs 11 (23%) patients, p<0.05). A total of 134 (43%) patients on IV chemotherapy versus 15 (31%) patients in the oral group did not point out any limitation for number of tablets per day (p = 0.004). Conclusions We observed a propensity from the patient perspective in favor of oral chemotherapy that was considered to have a lower impact on family and work commitments than IV chemotherapy. The treatment that patients were taking when the questionnaire was administered likely influenced their perception and related results.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2015-02-07 | Tumori |