6533b82ffe1ef96bd1295136
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures among people with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nicola VeroneseMarco SolmiM. De HertAngela FavaroBrendon StubbsBrendon StubbsDavy VancampfortClaudio LuchiniLorenza CaregaroChristoph U. CorrellChristoph U. CorrellPaolo Santonastasosubject
medicine.medical_specialtyBone densityOsteoporosis030209 endocrinology & metabolismComorbidityFeeding and Eating Disorderseating disorders (ED)Fractures Bone03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineBone DensityInternal medicinemedicineHumans030212 general & internal medicineFemoral neckBulimia nervosabusiness.industryAnorexia nervosaOdds ratiomedicine.diseaseOsteopeniaPsychiatry and Mental healthEating disordersmedicine.anatomical_structureBulimia nervosaosteoporosis rateEating disordersPhysical therapyOsteoporosisAmenorrheamedicine.symptomAnorexia nervosa; Bone density; Bulimia nervosa; Eating disorders; Fractures; Psychiatry and Mental Healthbusinessmeta-analytical evidence of bonemineral density (BMD)Fracturesanorexia nervosa; bone density; bulimia nervosa; eating disorders; fracturesdescription
Objective: To provide meta-analytical evidence of bone mineral density (BMD), fractures, and osteoporosis rates in eating disorders (ED) vs. healthy controls (HCs). Method: Three independent authors searched major electronic databases from inception till August 2015 for cross-sectional studies reporting BMD in people with ED (anorexia nervosa, (AN); bulimia nervosa, (BN); eating disorders not otherwise specified, (EDNOS)) vs. HCs. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) ±95% and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for BMD, and odds ratios (ORs) for osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures. Results: Overall, 57 studies were eligible, including 21 607 participants (ED = 6485, HCs = 15 122). Compared to HC, AN subjects had significantly lower BMD values at lumbar spine (SMD = -1.51, 95% CI = -1.75, -1.27, studies = 42), total hip (SMD = -1.56, 95%CI = -1.84, -1.28, studies = 23), intertrochanteric region (SMD = -1.80, 95%CI = -2.46, -1.14, studies = 7), trochanteric region (SMD = -1.05, 95%CI = -1.44, -0.66, studies = 7), and femoral neck (SMD = -0.98, 95%CI = -1.12, -0.77, studies = 20). Reduced BMD was moderated by ED illness duration and amenorrhea (P < 0.05). AN was associated with an increased likelihood of osteoporosis (OR = 12.59, 95%CI = 3.30-47.9, P < 0.001, studies = 4) and fractures (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.17-2.89, I2 = 56, studies = 6). No difference in BMD was found between BN and EDNOS vs. HC. Conclusion: People with AN have reduced BMD, increased odds of osteoporosis and risk of fractures. Proactive monitoring and interventions are required to ameliorate bone loss in AN. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-01-01 | Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica |