6533b830fe1ef96bd1296792
RESEARCH PRODUCT
Deviance detection in sound frequency in simple and complex sounds in urethane-anesthetized rats
Markku PenttonenTiantian YangArto LipponenPiia AstikainenJarmo A. HämäläinenLohvansuu Kaisasubject
medicine.medical_specialtyMismatch negativityhavaitseminenLocal field potentialBiologyStimulus (physiology)AudiologyAuditory cortexUrethane050105 experimental psychologyhäiriöt03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicinelocal-field potentialsotorhinolaryngologic diseasesmedicineAnimalsauditory cortex0501 psychology and cognitive scienceschange detectionAudio frequencyHuman studies05 social sciencestaajuusElectroencephalographykuuloSensory SystemsRatsratsElectrophysiologySoundaivokuoriAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials Auditorymismatch negativityelektrofysiologiaääni (fysikaaliset ilmiöt)koe-eläinmallitärsykkeet030217 neurology & neurosurgeryChange detectiondescription
Mismatch negativity (MMN), which is an electrophysiological response demonstrated in humans and animals, reflects memory-based deviance detection in a series of sounds. However, only a few studies on rodents have used control conditions that were sufficient in eliminating confounding factors that could also explain differential responses to deviant sounds. Furthermore, it is unclear if change detection occurs similarly for sinusoidal and complex sounds. In this study, we investigated frequency change detection in urethane-anesthetized rats by recording local-field potentials from the dura above the auditory cortex. We studied change detection in sinusoidal and complex sounds in a series of experiments, controlling for sound frequency, probability, and pattern in a series of sounds. For sinusoidal sounds, the MMN controlled for frequency, adaptation, and pattern, was elicited at approximately 200 ms onset latency. For complex sounds, the MMN controlled for frequency and adaptation, was elicited at 60 ms onset latency. Sound frequency affected the differential responses. MMN amplitude was larger for the sinusoidal sounds than for the complex sounds. These findings indicate the importance of controlling for sound frequency and stimulus probabilities, which have not been fully controlled for in most previous animal and human studies. Future studies should confirm the preference for sinusoidal sounds over complex sounds in rats. peerReviewed
year | journal | country | edition | language |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-06-11 | Hearing Research |